1.7-The Solution (Promise) · 3.6-Politics · Core

Is The Problem Really Democracy? Here Is Your Answer.

The problem is not DEMOCRACY (the choice of leadership) but the combination of:

1) DISCRETIONARY RULE, where leaders can legislate (issue commands) anything that the public will allow them to, rather than RULE OF LAW, under NATURAL LAW, where (like our trial-run original constitution) they can only construct otherwise legal contracts between members of the polity on their behalf. Much legislation is not (objectively) LEGAL in the sense that it violates NATURAL LAW: the preservation of the incentive to cooperate by the requirement for productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges, limited to productive externalities.

And 2) UNIVERSAL ENFRANCHISEMENT rather than demonstrated ability earning enfranchisement. But unlike Plato and Socrates, recommend, it’s not EDUCATION that demonstrates wisdom, but ACHIEVEMENT in life. Why? Because the reason we no longer possess RULE OF LAW, and are the victims of DISCRETIONARY RULE is the fault of the academy’s teaching of social pseudoscience for 140 years. So conversely, how do we know we are in fact ‘educating’ rather than ‘deceiving’? I am not the first philosophy to suggest that the 20th century will be remembered as an era of pseudoscience and the refutation of democracy – because of the failure of the academy. So the reason our ancestors required PROPERTY(demonstrated ability) and military service (warranty or ‘skin in the game’) was that together they DEMONSTRATED knowledge and investment, they didn’t ‘imagine’ that they were knowledgeable, because they had an education, or ‘imagine’ people were moral – they wanted empirical EVIDENCE OF IT. For a criticism of the university systems see either Sowell’s work on education and intellectuals, or See Kaplan’s work on the fallacy of the rational voter, and his work on Universities: there is very little evidence that universities do anything more than filter by workload. They teach almost nothing that produces outcomes other than fitness for workloads.

3) MONOPOLY COMMONS. All MONOPOLIES are ‘bad’ because they prohibit innovation, and they allow us to violate the Natural Law of Cooperation. Yet majoritarian democracy produces a monopoly. There is no reason why Seattle must choose between a Monorail and a Train, when they can choose both and let the best solution win. The excuse is efficiency. But this is a deception. Instead, the competition will force voters to pay for that which is most likely to succeed not what they themselves want at the expense of others – and that is more efficient. The purpose of majoritarian democracy is to legitimize authority – to rubber stamp the oligarchy’s choices. Majoritarian democracy is possible for the selection of priorities among people with common interests (farmers), where resources are scarce.

But markets (contracts) are the solution to heterogeneous polities with disparate or competing interests (like ours today), where expenditures of resources are plentiful (surpluses are possible) must be constrained in order to prevent expansion of debt. So instead of single house majoritarian democracy, our ancestors created houses for each class, so that classes could construct exchanges, rather than rule over one another. They created a MARKET for the construction of COMMONS between the classes, just as they had created a market for the consumption of goods and services: cities. Just as they had created a market for leadership by voting. Just as they had created a market for dispute resolution that we call the ‘independent judiciary’ under ‘rule of law’.

So you see, democracy can function as a market if and only if we restore market institutions, instead of market-violating institutions: multiple houses of government (families, businesses, territories, monarchy-as-vote-of-last-resort-by-veto, and then we can have democracy. Otherwise democracy is just a means by which to fraudulently legitimize the formation of tyranny by monopoly.

Why this is so difficult? Because the academy teaches pseudoscience, not social science.

Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine

The New Right · Uncategorized

Prosecutor vs Educator – But Otherwise Its The Same Message


Stephan Molyneux won’t engage me. It’s a loss for the movement really. The contrast would be brilliant.

SECRET: I might be an effete, but I know who I am marketing to: the same as Trump-the people willing to fight.

Stephan argues MORAL CHOICE, and I argue LEGAL LIMITS. His Golden rule and my Silver. But it’s the same msg.

It’s sometimes hard to grasp the difference between creating MORAL POSSIBILITY and limiting IMMORAL ACTIONS.

Western Civilization does not engage in conflation, so RELIGION, MORALITY, and LAW are different disciplines.

Stephan practices Moral Philosophy,and I Practice Moral LAW. (Positive advocacy vs Negative threat). Same Msg

We require BOTH. Positive advocacy for the purpose of pedagogy, and negative prohibition for limits.

This is why Stephan’s work and mine overlap so much, but ‘sound’ different. He’s a teacher, I’m a prosecutor.

And if you understand scientific epistemology that’s how it functions: positive THEORY and negative TEST.

Stephan made a career out of educating. I’ve made a body of law, and I teach prosecutors. It’s that simple.

Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine

Criticisms of the Left · The New Right

The Racist Paul Krugman – Wishing White People Dead Even Sooner

(profound) (read) (share)

—“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman

Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor?

Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it?

Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to?

Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition?

Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital?

Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms?

You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold?

What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)?

We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents?

If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech.

If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then.

Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction?

With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right?

We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman.

There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law.

Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science.

Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience.

And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit.

And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital.

And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries.

I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold.


Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.

4.2-Construction · P04-Law · Sequences · Uncategorized

Sequence: Criteria for Membership

If you respect life, limb, property, commons, norm, and law, you obtain the insurance of juridical defense: rule of law.

If you produce income, pay taxes, you gain access to membership in the Jury.

If you acquire property, you marry, and you have children, you gain access to membership in the house of common people.

If you Own a business,employ > 50 people,or manage an enterprise, and employ > 1000 people, you gain access to membership in the H. of Commerce.

If you govern a state you gain access to membership to the House of Lords (Territories).

If you demonstrate none of these, you possess juridical defense, but no influence against your peers, since voting is violence.






Criticisms of the Left · The New Right

On CalExit

The International challenges we face are due to our status as empire. End the empire, focus on local culture and people. Secede.

The only value of Geographic scale is the military tax base. The USA is not a country it is an empire. End it. Devolve to Regions.

There is no advantage to territorial scale if different regions cannot pursue cultural and legal preferences that they seek.

The USA has two strategies to avoid civil war: exit California and leave the rest, or exit Texas and take heartland with it.

Without California and Quebec, both the USA and Canada would remain Nationalist, ‘Heartland’ nations.

California does the same damage to the rest of American that Quebec does to the rest of Canada. Not all compromises are beneficial.

Women, Men, Relationships

The Continental Marriage is Better

Male-Female Relationship lessons learned from Ukraine.

1 – Men are barely tamed gorillas. Love them. Feed them. F– them. If necessary dress them.

2 – Women are incomprehensible. Their job is to love. Love them. Supply them. Make them feel safe.

3 – No talk of equality or how we should behave. No trying to train or change each other. No criticizing men for gorilla-ing, and no criticizing women for loving.

Their system is better. No Question. That’s why they’re so poor but still so wonderful. That’s why we’re so broken. We ended the contract between men and women. Men are not women. Women are not men. And any pretense of otherwise is just a lie to perpetuate a fraud, by which to steal, instead of trade.

That’s what I learned.

P04-Law · Uncategorized


Nov 11, 2016 10:38pm

Humans create commands, legislation, and regulations. Laws, both physical and natural (cooperation), we can only discover. We cannot any more create a law of cooperation (natural law) than we can a law of nature (physical laws). The only difference between physical laws and natural laws is that since we have memories, we can cooperate across time rather than be limited to the moment of the difference in potential.

(That might be hard to catch without pondering a bit.)