Rest > Explore > Stressor > Search > Stalk > Chase > Bite > Dissect > Consume, (repeat the cycle)

1) REST : SEARCH (Self) (our brain is always searching)

2) STRESS TRIGGER: Need for Stability:
Stress triggers your automatic nervous system, or fight-or-flight response. A period of arousal is followed by a return to normalcy and calm. Individuals with higher N scores have a shorter trigger and can’t take a lot of stress before feeling it. People with lower N scores are able to take abundant amounts of stress before feeling it.

3) SEARCH (EXPLORE): (Thing) Originality: (burn free calories in exploration)
Novelty is the trigger. Dopamine is widely considered the “creativity” chemical, with levels of dopamine and dopamine receptors related to one’s ability to hold visual images in the mind. Your O score represents the point at which you have used up your available dopamine in your pursuit of novelty and your system says “no more novelty or complexity. Take me back to the simple and familiar, the tried and true.”

4) SEARCH (FULLNESS): (Other) Extraversion:
Sensation, or the five senses, is the trigger. Your E score is an estimate of the point when your motoric nervous system is aroused, becomes saturated with sensation and craves relief. Extraversion is traditionally associated with sociability because other people are the most common source of stimulation. People with higher E scores can take more sensation before becoming saturated.

5) “STALK” – Consolidation:
Distractions are the trigger. The arousal system supporting C behaviors is the attentional focus system, greatly impacted by levels of testosterone. High levels of testosterone are associated with a greater capacity for sustained, repetitive, goal-focused behavior. Distractions trigger the attentional system, causing loss of focus.Your C score is an estimate of the point when you finally say, “That’s enough focusing for now. Time for a break.”

6) CHASE/DOMINANCE or RETREAT- DEFEND/SUBMISSION:
Dominance vs Submission Excitement vs Calm Oppy vs Loss
Accommodation:
The trigger is dominance. The arousal system consists of sex hormones (such as testosterone and estrogen) and serotonin, the neurotransmitter involved in sleep, depression and memory. For people with a relative abundance of male hormones and a relative deficit of female hormones, defiance is the norm. Someone with an opposite balance of hormones would normally be submissive. Your A score is an estimate of the point when you tire of being defiant and turn submissive.

7) “KILL” (Bite)/ Fight/Flight

8) TRANSITION(DISSECT): SUCCESS vs FAILURE (Self)
Dominance reward vs submission reward.

9) CONSUME: EAT, SHARE, NURSE (other).

10) RETURN TO REST(1),

There you go.

Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.

Are women able, meaning do they possess the physical, emotional, and intellectual agency, to speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, without regard to the signal and status economy?

If the west is demarcated from all other civilizations by the demand for truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, despite its impact on the signal and status economy, then does it suprise us that women are the primary agents under which the west was destroyed by Abrahamism in the ancient world (christianity and islame) and in the modern (marxism, socialism, postmodernism, islam)?

(Please Sign) (Please Share)

Rule of law under natural law of reciprocity requires markets in everything, that are limited to productive externalities, without possibility of competition or even criticism since any criticism of rule of law of reciprocity can only consist of fraud or deceit. If fascism means “prohibition on political competition” then that is in fact ‘rule of law under reciprocity’. Nationalism and limited socialism are both possible and necessary under such market constraints (really). As such I see the term ‘fascism’ as meaning nothing other than non-competitition in political order, leaving open the question of how such a political order is managed. From my understanding, the optimum means of providing rule of law under the natural law of reciprocity, markets for goods, services, and information, markets for association, cooperation, reproduction (family), production, is a monarchy as justice of of last resort, an independent judiciary, a universal militia, and if small enough, the discretionary production of commons by the monarchy. And if too large, the creation of a market for commons between the classes wherein each house is limited to those members who have demonstrated success prior to access. The the house of dependents, the house of families, the house of commerce, the house of militia (military), the house of law (judiciary) with the judiciary, military, and Monarchy holding only veto power.

In that sense, I am a fascist: all political competition against the natural law of reciprocity is either fraud or war.

—“Some men just want to see the world burn.”—

Socialists(priesthood): Faith in Technology
-vs-
Aristocrats(military): Certainty of Genetics

feminine vs masculine

If you think I’ve made a fuss about idealism in mathematics, wait to you see what I do to english grammar….. lol

Interesting. I have an ancestor in the New Haven Colony that lived to 103, dying in Wallingford. Didn’t know that.

If you don’t ‘go slumming’ you cannot understand the lower middle, working, laboring, and underclass peasantry. The vast majority of these people who are above 95 at least, are not immoral. They may be ignorant. They may lack opportunity to produce competitively enough to prosper, and they may feel left behind, that their contribution to moral norms is not reciprocated, but they are not immoral.

Likewise, if you have never dined with the political, industrial (entrepreneurs with > 1000 employees), the financial class (serving the capitalists), or the capitalist class (the wealthy families), then you cannot understand that by and large they try to be moral. In my experience most of us try to be moral. The problem is just that we extend our concept of morality into a universal rather than a class, and that our institutions provide too few means of voluntary exchange, so that the various classes can achieve what they desire without resorting to fraud, conspiracy, and subterfuge. And the presently/academic classes outside of the STEM courses are, along with politicians they produce, the only immoral people that I know of (other than government employees outside of the market.)

I’ve been an effete snob whether it was the early 70’s when my parents were financially struggling to keep the business going, when I was a middle class exec, or a member of the economic 1%.

But I have never lost my Paganism (Love of Nature), Catholicism (Social Love of Others), or my Aryanism (Transcendence of man through heroic excellence). (Although due to my obsessiveness I have lost my senses more than a few times for certain.)

I love most laboring men, I love working class people, I love lower middle class, and middle class people. My distaste for the upper middle is the product of university indoctrination in the pseudoscientific religions of the 20th century. My distaste for the financial and capitalist class is the result of failing to constrain them from perverse incentives. My distaste for the political class is that anyone who would engage in such a thing is an unredeemable danger to the rest of us, and the most evil of all.

We are all fools. Children riding the elephant of our intuition whose actions are controlled by nothing more than reproductive strategy.

Six Italian men in their 50’s and 60’s sitting outside a coffee shop talking nonsense. Living in the moment.

They are happier the than most of us will ever be in late age. Why? Friends are the best investment in entertainment, and that’s not only because the only investment required is time.

So, is the alt right gone?

Just as progressives demonstrate caution in the face of artificial intelligence, progressives(dysgenicists) fear conservatives(eugenicists). Because if we are successful in restoring our eugenic personal, social, economic, and political order, we will leave them behind. Just as they fear the mechanical social, economic, and political order, will leave them behind.

This is the intuition of the feminine: that her offspring, the vast majority of which are dead weight on the man, earth, and universe, will not survive competition with their betters, and therefore here genes will not persist. Her emotions are precognitive genetic impulses to favor the child regardless of it’s lack of merit.

The intuition of the masculine: that the genes of the family, clan, tribe and nation must survive competition with other men’s genes through the use of female hosts – despite the fact that women choose mates poorly, that they undermine the alphas, and the polity in pursuit of equality for those who are dead weight to our genes. That they advocate against their men (“sh_t testing”) and that they destroy loyalty and cohesion through gossip.

The universe, like our parents, births life which itself will replace that universe if successful. And expire like that universe if not. Life is deterministic. Action is deterministic. Intelligence is deterministic. Cooperation is deterministic. Self replacement is deterministic. That’s all the wonderous beauty we need.

There is an aristocratic ethic in the literature of exploration and colonization – and science fiction of the postwar period replaced the *actual* aristocracy of exploration and colonization that had existed prior to the war.

So just as James Bond is really a lament to lost british power, science fiction of the period was a lament to lost european power. It was an effort to direct our exploration and colonization (and militarism) to the stars.

I think that christianity was a vehicle for aryanism (heroism, aristocracy, exploration, expansion, colonization, domestication of nature, beast, and man) and I think the period of expansion in the ancient world, and in the modern, was just another vehicle for Aryanism.

That same Aryanism (heroism, aristocracy, expansion, colonization, domestication of nature, beast, and man), can be heard in Ellison, Clarke, (or jules Verne, or Edgar burroughs, Or Robert Howard, or HG Wells, or Tolkien, or Stephenson and Gibson, is that Aryanism via military, scientific, traditional, and technological classes.

This is the Aryanism of the military, scientific, traditional, and technological classes, just as capitalism is an expression of Aryanism in the merchant classes.

Heinlein reformed Aryanism in the early-mid 20th century like Sir Walter Scott reframed it in the early 19th century with Ivanhoe. (or George Lucas refrormed it with the original star wars.).

And I do think that Heinlein captured that reformation in language that all of us can understand today. And that it has endured through the postmodern rise and fall of the late 20th and early 21st century.

—“Did Heinlein have an influence on you? I have been listening to Starship Troopers and I swear I hear you and Eli, mostly you.”— Anne Summers

Great Question.

(a) I had only read Time Enough for Love (which I read upon release). I was heavily influenced by it and think I still am subconsciously.. I was more influenced by Harlan Ellison and I see him in my thoughts. Maybe Ben Bova as well. I was influenced by Arthur c Clarke, particularly Rendezvous with Rama and Childhood’s end. But I was equally if not more so influenced by William Gibson and Neal Stephenson. Im really a child of the 70’s and 80’s – when these books were published. But I was more influenced by reading weapons and warfare and in particular samuel colt, and then reading encyclopedias. I read a lot of encyclopedias.

(b) I think that there is an aristocratic ethic in the literature of exploration and colonization, and science fiction of the postwar period replaced the *actual* aristocracy of exploration and colonization that had existed prior to the war. So just as James Bond is really a lament to lost british power, science fiction of the period was a lament to lost european power. It was an effort to direct our exploration and colonization (and militarism) to the stars.
(c) I think that christianity was a vehicle for aryanism (heroism, aristocracy, exploration, expansion, colonization, domestication of nature, beast, and man) and I think the period of expansion in the ancient world, and in the modern, was just another vehicle for Aryanism.

(d) what you hear in Eli and I is that same Aryanism (heroism, aristocracy, expansion, colonization, domestication of nature, beast, and man). What you Hear in Ellison, Clarke, (or jules Verne, or Edgar burroughs, Or Robert Howard, or HG Wells, or Tolkien, or Stephenson and Gibson, is that Aryanism via military, scientific, traditional, and technological classes. This is the Aryanism of the military, scientific, traditional, and technological classes, just as capitalism is an expression of Aryanism in the merchant classes.

(e) Heinlein reformed Aryanism in the early-mid 20th century like Sir Walter Scott reframed it in the early 19th century with Ivanhoe. (or George Lucas refrormed it with the original star wars.). And I think Eli and I and many others are formed by that same experience. And I do think that Heinlein captured that reformation in language that all of us can understand today. And that it has endured through the postmodern rise and fall of the late 20th and early 21st century.

(f) So I think that the answer is that we have both been heavily influneced by the Aryan tradition. And that we certainly share the mid-century technological vision of Aryanism consisting of the combination of military and technology as a DEFENSE, rather than military and religion of the post-ancient period, or military and moral justification of the colonial period. And that among the technological, military, scientific, classes, Heinlein created the least apologetic vision. And that we share that least apologetic, and therefore most Aryan ethic.

(g) The only difference is that Eli is more interested in space, and I am more interested in upping our game and taking over this planet over the objections of those who need domestication. In other words, he is kinder than I. Hence why you hear a bit more Aurthur Clarke in Eli and a bit more Heinlein in me: I am ‘resigned’ to the military option as the only viable (affordable) one. 😉

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Sailor,
Rich Man, Poor Man, Beggar Man, Thief,
Doctor, Lawyer, Merchant, Jailer,
Captain, Pirate, Fisherman, Chief,
Teacher, Preacher, Craftsman, Laborer,
Farmer, Baker, Gardener, Cook,
Capitalist, Banker, Teller, Burglar,
Writer, Journalist, Politician, Crook

—“The block will be active for 6 days and 20 hours more.”—

1 WK TILL UNBLOCKED

A priest lies to you by lying, fiction, inflation.
A novelist tells you what you want to hear through fiction.
A merchant, financier, or economist tells you what you want to hear by cherry picking a half-truth.
A a scientist tells you uncomfortable truths.
A judge tells you painful truths.

All the reason you need: It is simply much cheaper to produce deception, parasitism, and dysgenia, than to produce truth, productivity, and eugenia. So over time, we cannot cohabitate.

It’s our own progressive that we must separate from. Do you understand? They are the defect that remains.

Getting frustrated. Do you realize that everything good in europe comes from northern italy, germany, austria, and england? The best genes come from the baltic and north sea – the border between german, polish and scandinavian peoples. And that nearly everything bad in europe has come from France? (Aside from Brittany). Seriously. It’s like Lotharingia did everything good and france did everything possible to turn europe to shit in every single era of history. Really. I mean. WFT is wrong with those people? Aside from terminal effeminacy? France is and always has been the enemy of europa. I thought it was just since the revolution. And that postmoderns were just another version of french mental illness. But no. I mean, the entire period from the roman fall to the present. Drive around france today and it’s largely a sh–t hole. Damn.

(I feel like I just sat down in an episode of the Sopranos. Lots of severely overweight mediterraneans with 95 IQ’s, speaking a passionate vulgar vernacular. But it’s all good natured. lol )

–“I hear you’re a stoic.”– (a friend)

I am (exist as) a bag of mostly water and a few chemicals that arranged in a particular order, we call ‘human’. (Although, that’s an opinion others have questioned. 😉 )

I practice a ‘complete’ version of science I call Testimonialism.

That science tells me that stoicism provides the optimum personal mindfulness (mental training). And that Ritual, Feast, and Festival provide the optimum social mindfulness. And that commerce provides the optimum normative mindfulness. And that military service provides the optimum political mindfulness. And that history and heroic fiction we call myth provide the optimum general model of decidability.

My ‘Belief System’ is here….

1 – Persistence
2 – Acquisition
3 – Agency
4 – Status

THE MEANING OF “SACRED”

Recent political events have brought to the fore, discourse on the sacred. But what does the word ‘sacred’ mean?

It means a total prohibition on privatization of the commons, or socialization of losses into the commons, in display, word, and deed.

In other words, you have zero rights to those commons, zero rights in those commons, and you benefit from those commons precisely because you have no rights to them or in them – as does no one else.

THE CHURCH
Christianity teaches us one unique thing and teaches us one general thing.

For christianity, it saturates us in narratives and rituals that ask us to extend kinship love to non kin – on an individual basis (not a political or military). It asks us to eliminate hatred from the human heart. This just happens to be the optimum cooperative strategy: exhausting investment in cooperation before engaging in retaliation, and when engaging in retaliation doing so out of necessity, and without emotion.

The church, temple, or ritual experience teaches us sacredness: that there are conditions under which we have no rights of expression: in display, word, or deed. It teaches us Agency over ourselves.

Those capable of agency can be taught. Those who lack agency over themselves demonstrate that they are a danger to the rest. And as most of us recall, as children, adhering to ritual in church for a single hour once a week is an exercise in self discipline that even the most well intentioned may struggle with.

THE POLITY
We have seen the total destruction of the sacred in pursuit avoiding the effort of developing agency over the self – such that we learn to fast, learn to constrain our actions, our minds, our words, and our displays.

And this is because like the parable of the boiling frog, we cannot sense the intertemporal in the moment or even in our lives. Even if we can sense the consequences of our failure to pay the high cost (tax) of developing agency, and the sacred as one more kind of fitness.

Physical Fitness (the body)
Mental Fitness (mindfulness)
Emotional Fitness (Sacredness)
Social Fitness (Manners, ethics, morals, traditions, Rituals)
Economic Fitness (the skills of measurement)
Political Fitness (the natural law)

Lousy individuals band together. Weak families band together. Good families band together. Great families persist over many generations.

Your demographics determine the distribution of lousy, weak, good, and great.

And your norms, traditions, and institutions are determined by media distribution family type.

It’s not complicated. It’s not only simple. It’s obvious.

(diary entry)

I think I’m back. Or at least, I’m just about back. It’s taken me a year this time – possibly because I had to first get over the pneumonia, then feed and sleep myself out of exhaustion, and then to insulate myself from allergens. I’ve started working out again. Just once a week. And I have excess energy again. I walk fast again. I have enthusiasm again. Although I still seem to be extremely sensitive to getting enough sleep.

I am still having trouble “getting into the zone:, and I think it’s environmental. It’s so much easier in a country where no one speaks your language and you can’t get caught up in advertisements or the news (or the heated politics of the day.) No wonder Wittgenstein moved to Norway….. 😉 So I can’t get 36 hours of continuous thought on a subject here. And that’s slowing me down.

That said, I feel increasingly good about the grammar of decidability. And thanks to an offhand comment by Joel Davis the other day, I see the historical context that I hadn’t before. And that has given me a narrative to explain it within.

Recovery from overdoing it is hard. In 1982 it definitely took me more than six months. In 1987 it took me nine months. In 1996 it took me more than six months. In 2001, it took me, I think, four months – maybe six months. And recovering from the cancer in 2002… its hard to tell. More than a year. In 2008-9… well that’s hard to tell because of the illnesses, but I think it took me to 2013 to get over 2008-2012 to get reasonably straight, before my own government tried to destroy me in 2014. and I am not sure that until now I’d recovered from 2014-2016. This time it took a year for certain. So you know, I tend to burn myself out pretty seriously, and then recover, on fairly regular cycles. Every new business does it. Every divorce does it. Every episode of cancer did it.

Aspies should live simple lives. This whole normie-thing is just too hard on the body. Sure, you can mentally defeat normies really easily, but you’re still stuck with the same physiology as normies and they just can listen to their bodies better than we do – and obey them. 😉

Everything else is a substitute for children.

I’ve made my choice. Right it is.

Revolution is for Men, Not Dilettantes.

TAKE THE HEAT. AND USE IT TO START THE FIRE

If you need a symbol to rally behind other than the line of your people, back to the beginning of time, then you are simply weak. If you want a cross, moon, or star, or other icon then you’re part of the problem, not part of the solution. Those symbols were invented to erase the lines between peoples not create them.