(a) when I define a thing, in my arguments, a thing means what I define it to mean, and nothing else. In this case the limit of my definition of agency is omniscience, “omniexperience”, “omnigrammar”, and omnipotence, in thought, emotion, word, and deed.

(b) I chose the term agency as I generally do, to extend an existing term that was partly false to one that is not false.

(c) I developed ‘Agency’ to provide commensurability with ‘Truth’, ‘Sovereignty’, as approaching but never reaching Completion.

(e) and the reason is, that in agency, like truth and sovereignty I cannot know the future structures of all kinds that make those conditions possible, and as such defined it for likewise infinite decidability.

(d) The fact that we can organize to produce agency is handled elsewhere, and a given.