The will to power and the non aggression principle, are both incomplete sentences for a reason: to sound profound without actually being profound. The will to power of or over what? Non aggression against what? Unless you answer those questions both propositions are just sophisms. They require substitution on the part of the individual. And as such tell us nothing other than whatever it is we already presume.

AGENCY, SOVEREIGNTY, AUTONOMY, …. with what resources?

Advertisements