You really aren’t up to this category of arguments – or concepts. Let me help you.
1 – The culmination of 20th century investigation into the scientific method was that there is no via-positiva scientific method – nor is there any via-positiva logic. Instead, the scientific method consists of producing testifiable testimony regardless of via positiva method of investigation, and the logics test the consistency of constant relations from given premises.
2 – In case you didn’t grasp it the first time: Determinism(ideal), Deterministic(within limits), Determinable (within limits), just as Truth (ideal), Truth (within limits of speech), and Truthful (within limits of testimony).
3) The universe is deterministic (describable by rules of arbitrary precision), but not does not fit determinism (the scale of the universe and causal density at lowest scales makes a general rule of infinite precision (at present) unlikely, whereas we can, and have, produced (identified) many general rules of arbitrary(scale within paradigm) precision.
So gain, Please. Dispense your sophims upon those who are impressed, by your desperate search for dominance expression, and leave those of us who are adults (and men) to do our duty: protecting the informational commons from overconfident men and solipsistic women.