–“I define anarchist society as one where there is no legal possibility for coercive aggression against the person or property of any individual.” — Murray N. Rothbard
—“There needs to be a detailed explanation as to how this statement is sophistry
Curt Doolittle.”— Χρόνος @HliosX, Murray Rothbard @MurraySuggests
The Jewish method of deceit by sophism (pilpul), and Rothbard’s application of the Jewish method of deceit by suggestion: “I define a perfect object as one that has four dimensions” The fact that it’s possible to imagine but impossible to construct any object in four dimensions isn’t stated.
Mathematical axioms are declarative (we make them up), literary consistencies (pseudo-axioms) are declarative (they are only analogies), and physical laws are existential (we merely discover them, and can’t make them up). It doesn’t matter what you define (axioms) it matters only what exists and can be constructed by actions (laws).
Once we know the Jewish method of deceit by pilpul (sophism) the technique is obvious: false promise, baiting into hazard, advocated by pilpul (sophism, overloading, suggestion), defended by critique(undermining), via pretense of plausible deniability, and absent warranty.
We then compare this to the Western test of Operational Construction: How can a thing be brought into being by a sequence of actions, and persist if it is? An example of idealism (sophism) vs realism (operationalism). The Greeks innovated in truth and the jews in lying.
So, false promise of possibility or survival by suggestion (freedom from conformity, integration, paying costs of normative, institutional, territorial commons), false promise of ethics by non-coercion (psychological and personally controlled), rather than non-imposition (empirical, and controlled by those affected by your actions, and whether they retaliate). False promise (insinuation) of the nature of man, false promise of the function of state(assets), rule(conflict), government(cooperation in the production of commons).
Real purpose? Undermining western civilization’s competition, cooperation, cohesion, by militarization, duty, and production of commons for high returns on those commons. Create the oppression myth in order to obscure free riding on the production of commons by others.
Marx to undermine tripartism (cost of cooperation between the classes using markets under rule of law of tort), Rothbard to undermine the production of commons (cost). Friedan to undermine the family as an institution(cost) between men and women. Derrida undermine truth itself. Cultural Marxists (Frankfurt School) to undermine heroism, duty, honor, excellence, beauty, all of which are methods of paying costs of contribution to the commons.
They work to create the myth (false promise) that physical law and natural law are oppressions by man. (In effect they’re calling our people ‘gods’.) And that western aristocracy oppresses man, rather than that western man has discovered optimums: work in concert with physical and natural law.
Their strategy is to hide under myth of persecution and oppression rather than being prohibited from free riding, baiting into hazard, and undermining, while they profit from undermining societies by sowing discord.
And while there is little shame in it, because this technique of deceit is very advanced, you my friend are just as much a useful idiot of the enemy of our people and our civilization as are the useful idiots of the marxists.
So my unsolicited advice is that you learn their technique of lying, and my techniques of how to articulate, expose, and defeat their lies, and how to produce a constitution and body of law, that creates rule of law of tort preventing imposition on our demonstrated intersets.
So that we can prevent not only the misuse of rule of law, state, court, and government to produced imposition of costs on us by well intentioned and unaccountable fools, and malicious groups whose sole group strategy for survival is the undermining more advanced peoples.
And repeating a dark age in the modern world with Marxism, Libertarianism, Neoconservatism, Feminism, and Postmodernism by combining the Jewish method of deceit by sophism with pseudoscience as they did in the dark age of judaism, christianity and islam in the ancient with theology.
We look at history and see the great achievements of western and eastern civilizations, vs the destruction of every other civlization that arose under agrarianism – without cognizance that technology of both Truth (western, eastern) and Deceit (middle eastern) evolved apace.
And that the battle for the future is between another semitic dark age under another era of lies, poverty, and destruction, or another european renaissance and enlightenment under another era of truth, prosperity, and innovation.
The enemy (purveyors of abrahamism), is just as sophisticated in deceit, undermining, ignorance, and dysgenia, as we are in truth, cooperation, innovation, and eugenia.
So stop being a useful idiot, undermining the miracle of western civilization’s heroism, excellence, beauty, truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity, rule of law, jury, and markets in all aspects of life – that dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, and disease.
And instead, work to produce western, empirical, evidentiary, operational, logical, rational, and cooperative optimum and the commons that result, from the direction of dominance to the production of commons including truth, trust, property, and sovereignty.
And be upfront and honest that eugenics has been our strategy, and that markets are softly and empirically eugenic, if we limit reproduction to those who can afford their reproduction by participation in those markets.
But that we do not abandon those who by accident of birth or circumstance require extra-market organization – not possible to organize in the production of commons under the pricing systems incentives. We merely limit their reproduction to one child – and time cures all.
Peoples who never developed agrarian norms, traditions, institutions and genetics,and remained migratory thieves(gypsies) or shepherds(arabs) on one end, or traders(jews) on the other, never developed the bias for commons and the returns on commons, and hence despotic empires.
We did develop those traditions (Market Hierarchy), Hindustanis did(Caste hierarchy) less so, and the Chinese(Monopoly hierarchy) did. The persians were ruined by three waves of muslim raiders. The arabs, jews, gypsies never did. And the pacific and africans were behind.
The world has only one enemy: the lies of the abrahamic peoples. The world has only one hero: the truth of natural law (aristotelian) peoples. Between is a spectrum.