FYI: “Between book, launching the courses, and the holidays I’m behind in moving data here. My posts from september thru december are available on FB.” –Curt
FYI: “Between book, launching the courses, and the holidays I’m behind in moving data here. My posts from september thru december are available on FB.” –Curt
by John Mark
NZ SHOOTER ACCOMPLISHED ALL 3 OF HIS GOALS: 1, Acceleration, 2, Moving/smashing Overton window, 3, Revenge.
Acceleration. Just play out the game theory. The Left reacts utterly predictably to everything. Thus it is easy to play them like a fiddle. Everything the Left wants to do, they are already pushing for, hard. Gun grabs, demonize whitey, demonize the Right, etc. This NZ shooting just gives the Left more excuses & motivation to do it more, harder, faster. Which in turn amps up the Right’s angst & redpills more whites. It speeds up what’s already happening.
(Note, nothing in the current system can stop the Left once they start winning all the elections, and no leadership in the current system shows any willingness+ability to stop the costs being imposed on the Right and on whites. Thus the shooter’s logic was that there is no point in “keeping things civil” or “taking the high road” because that just means whites and the Right losing.)
His 2nd goal was to move the Overton window by sending a message: “If our governments will not protect us from violent underclass invaders, we will do it ourselves”; while simultaneously making Muslims feel less welcome in the West. He did this expertly by making his act difficult to memory-hole: live stream of his calculated act, “Kebab Removal” written on his gun (like something out of a revenge movie, memorable), full manifesto with mentions of Trump, Candace Owens and PewDiePie (ensures media attention, & blame placed on Trump by the Left etc.; attention = oxygen). Attacked least sympathetic group of immigrants (Muslims), thus a huge # of whites & right-wingers will find themselves agreeing with at least parts of his manifesto & will not jump to victims’ defense near as much as with Jews or blacks. (This is already obvious on right-wing comment sections & social media.) Highlighted little girl killed by Muslim attack in Europe as his trigger. (Very sympathetic image to many people.) Talked openly about civil war & his desire to trigger/accelerate it. This shows “the Right is not afraid, but welcomes it”, and regardless of what one thinks of the act, it puts civil war into the conversation in a very powerful way, and no one can spin this or handwave it away as “oh, everything’s fine, conflict is not increasing, civil war isn’t possible” etc. He moved the Overton window expertly.
His 3rd goal was to get revenge on Muslims. Which he did.
He accomplished all 3 of his goals with aplomb.
(Note, this does not imply I condone his act.)
THE FORMAT OF POSTS – A STYLE GUIDE
1 – A POST
THIS TITLE MEANS I WROTE IT FOR YOU TO READ AS AN ARGUMENT
(this cues you to important stuff)
And this is the body text here.
Particularly if I break it into paragraphs.
––“this is quoting someone else”––
—this is quoting myself—
… … is a
… … … series that you might want to learn.
|SERIES|: This > Is > A > Dimensional > Definition
And more text goes here. Subheadings cue you to the content.
I use the signature line for myself. So that I can search for the posts I want to publish on my web site later. So they are sort of a ‘stamp of approval’.
2 – A NOTE OR SKETCH
this doesn’t have header, isn’t broken into paragraphs, and doesn’t even use init-caps, so it’s just a record from elsewhere or quick thought or observation, or a work in progress – rumination.
3 – A PERSONAL OPINION
(this doesn’t have a header, is in parenthesis and in all lower case, which means it’s possibly something to ignore … because it’s not an argument. it’s just an opinion or feeling.)
4 – A DIARY ENTRY
this is something I wrote for myself that is unfiltered, and likely includes very personal feelings of my own, or on the state of my thinking, and not something that you will probably want to read unless the psychology that I operate under is of some interest to you or other.
5 — ON STYLE
Karl Popper created (from aristotle, weber, and pareto) the method of analytic philosophy I make use of, which includes Definitions, Series, Lists, Tables, and parentheticals. He used italics a lot but italics aren’t available in FB or I would us Italics where I use Initial Capitals to denote the name of a definition in a series I have defined elsewhere.
Bold to allow for those of us who read quickly to scan by keywords.
German Capitals: for names of Ideas, like “Rationalism”, “Sovereignty”, “Propertarianism”, or Neologisms, or to alert you to disambiguation (redefinitions).
Parentheticals “(…)”: to bridge operational(technical) and meaningful(familiar) terms, or to limit interpretation. I try to use parentheticals to create parallel sequences between vernacular terminology and technical terminology, or to insert my ‘voice or opinion’ into the middle of an objective text.
Series and Lists : a sequence of definitions representing a spectrum of terms. The use of series deflates, increases precision, and defeats conflation. First exposure to the methodology’s use and repetition of series tends to both be the most obvious and most helpful of the techniques.
Constructions : tracing the path of the development of ideas from primitive to current constructions.
Algorithms : general processes for the construction of deflations.
– Analytic Philosophy is, of necessity, WORDY.
– Operational Language is, of necessity, WORDY.
– Programming Algorithms is, of necessity, WORDY.
– Law, whether Contractual, Legislative, or Constitutional, is WORDY.
– Algorithmic Natural Law is of necessity, WORDY.
Technical Languages evolve to speak precisely. Precise language contains technical terms and is wordy. Why, if all the other sciences require technical language, would we think that speaking technically in the science of cooperation is not going to be wordy?
Well, it’s going to be wordy.
6 – “WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY ‘USING PARENTHETICALS’?”
The use of parenthesis (parentheticals) to carry on (communicate) related (parallel) meanings (definitions) so that we both (simultaneously) convey meaning (free association), but at the same time prevent misinterpretation (provide limits).
In other words we can carry on via positiva and via negativa in the same paragraph or sentence. Or that we may use colloquial verse, but include technical terms. It’s profoundly effective.
If you read Popper’s work he uses italics (which was criticized at the time) for similar purposes.
IMHO parentheticals solve the problem of choosing latin prose consisting of long sentences, consisting of many related phrases (which Claire Rae Randall has brought up recently), or separating two sides of an argument into separate paragraphs.
Latin prose tends to be poetic in order to prevent judgment until later phrases emerge (lincoln’s gettysburg address). This becomes increasingly difficult as we speak in increasingly technical terms.
So my opinion is that the parenthetical technique is evolving as our grammatical solution to conceptual density in technical matters, where we can more easily communicate such concepts without burdening and confusing the audience with ‘hanging incomplete ideas’ (separate paragraphs), or too many hanging incomplete ideas (many phrases), by simply limiting each positive concept as its being used (via parentheticals).
But the operational definition would be to provide both meanings in common prose and limits in parentheticals or the reverse: provide precise terms in prose, and common examples in parenthesis, in the same sentence structure.
Now if you read Frank’s comments on other’s posts, at all you’ll see him do both Precise/Example, and Common/Technical at the same time.
This turns out to be what I suggest, is an almost perfect grammar. Or rather, the next evolution of grammar as we increase informaitonal density.
Because like the common law, it ‘corrects’ or ‘informs’ you immediately without requiring that you hold multiple dense contexts in your head until they are later resolved in the text.
My opinion, taken from Greg Bear, is that if we could talk and show flashes of images at the same time – say on our phones, or floating above our heads – then the combination of words (precision) and examples (Images) would create nearly perfect communication.
WRITING IN PARENTHETICALS, SERIES, AND AXES
I learned the technique of writing with series(sequences) and parenthetic parallels(like this) from Karl Popper (Critical Rationalism). And it was his adoption and use of of series rather than sets that distinguished Popper from the Analytic school. I did not understand originally what was superior about his approach to analytic philosophy, but I understood he had improved upon it. I only understood that he had identified that science was critical not justificationary (like morality and law), and that along with Hayek they were the first to grasp that social science like physical science, must be modeled as a problem of information, not an analogistic model from of prior generations(electricity, steam, water, mechanicals) – just as I understand our problem today is an artifact of industrialization and the attempt to manufacture identical units rather than ‘grow’ a portfolio of the best humans.
Later I came to understand that both parenthetic parallels, series, and relations between axis (think supply demand curves), provided tests of the NECESSITY of meaning, rather than NORMATIVE or COLLOQUIAL meaning. In other words, they limit the reader (and the author) from mal-attribution of properties that occur in normative and colloquial, and particular, and ‘ignorant’ speech.
I work in public, partly to conduct experiments. I am personally open in public because this prevents people attributing psychological motivations to me that I don’t have. I create conflict in order to run tests. The purpose of running a test is to attempt to create a proof.
The Propertarian Institute
Pivot To Good Government
1 – Emphasize policy (benefits)
2 – Emphasize Light Secession (decentralization of norms)
2 – Emphasize constitution (processes and procedures)
3 – Emphasize means of demand (actions to produce implementation.)
MESSAGE: SOMETHING FOR EVERYONE -EVERYONE WINS
4 – Maintain “Something for Everyone, but no Monopoly”
…. (a) Rights of exit, secession, voluntary disassociation for all.
…. (b) State religion for christians (god/jesus), pagans(hero gods), heathens (kin)
…. (c) Rule of law, devolution, secession for the libertarians
…. (d) Separatism for the nationalists
…. (e) Strong Man “Lite” for the fascists.
…. (f) National Socialism (French Version) for the average man.
MESSAGE: PUNISH THE WICKED – ONLY THE WICKED LOSE
5 – Commercial, Financial, Economic, Political, Educational dishonesty, parasitism, predation, and destruction of not only our people but all people.
6 – De-Emphasize Methodology
…. (a) Methodology is for Jurists, Prosecutors, Inquisitors, social scientists, professors, and teachers.
…. (b) The law is simple in the list of rights and applications.
…. (c) The law is only ‘complex’ in its language and definitions.
…. (d) There is only one law: Reciprocity (Trade). And only one good: exchanges that produce reciprocal preferences.
“WHAT DOES GSRM STAND FOR?”
—“You mention GSRM all the time, what does it stand for?”–
The Female (herd) competitive strategy by circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (G)ossiping (S)haming, (R)allying, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, and solving for face or consent – instead of Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood.
Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it.
In western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.
GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.
This is why the abrahamic (jewish in particular, or semitic in general) means of countering greco-roman-european argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with european reason science truth testimony.
Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost.
Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth.
Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth.
Yet it is truth over face that is the reason for the ‘western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest.
Hence why christians are the vulnerability of western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism.
Judaism to undermine, Christanity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The middle east uses the female reproductive strategy and the far east and far west use the male, with the far east using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the west using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the middle east today just as in the age of the greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end.
The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so.
The Propertarian Institute
My people (anglicans) have a higher average IQ than the ashkenazi but a narrower distribution. We are the upper class of the Anglos. What Ashkenazim (Half europeans, not others) produce is a wider distribution with many more outliers above 140 (2-4x), which is the difference between 11 and 14 dist’s. And outliers are more valuable in information processing. England had the same as ashkenazi IQ by 1790 (via lynn) but the industrial revolution has been doing to the west what it is now doing to chinese advantage, which is inverting rates of reproduction between the classes which will very shortly eliminate east asian advantage everywhere but korea and japan.
The question isn’t the disproportionate achievements of jews AFTER INTEGRATION into western civilization’s aristotelianism in exchange for ending deprivation from asset participation, it is why, the most literate population in the past 1500 years achieved absolutely NOTHING for mankind in that period while even under semitic deception (abrahamic religion) the west achieved more with fewer outliers – and the jews NOTHING.
In other words, why is it that jews are helpful to economies, but destructive to polities, happily undermine and destroy their social orders, and are continually cast out or worse, and such a huge literature (suppressed postwar) existed that they should be expelled from decent civilization for their continued crimes? Jews produced nothing of civic value. Nothing. No art. No literature, No science. No technology. No engineering, No architecture. No nation. No polity. No Civilization – nothing except a record of being the most immoral and despised people on earth? Why?
When and if the jews have this reformation they will cease being jews and that is the jewish conundrum. Because false promise, baiting into moral hazard, pilpul (what you are arguing with at the moment), critique (marxists, postmodernist, libertarians, neocons) cherry picking and straw manning will not be possible.
We look in the mirror and acknowledge our errors and try to guide the world into not repeating ours. What do your people do?
Very shortly we will outlaw the use of solving for volition and reasonableness regardless of externality,. rather than truth, reciprocity and externality, false promise; outlaw baiting into moral hazard, pilpul and critique and force involuntary warranty of all the above. This will cause everyone regardless of tradition or cult out of businesses dominated by those which profit from such uses of deceit (pornography, gambling, entertainment, media, advertising, commerce, finance, economics, law, and politics), and once it is no longer possible to use the abrahamic technique my suspicion is that many jews whose incomes depend upon it will migrate to those territories where such parasitism against the people is possible.
I don’t care what cult, race, tribe, gender, age group someone belongs to but the invention of organized lying by the rabbinical jews by incorporating greek idealism into egyptian and babylonian legend will be suppressed in our law. And every single person regardless of race, gender or creed will be accountable for his speech once again. and gossiping rallying shaming, ridicule in absence of argument will be met as it had always been with physical retaliation. We can tolerate it from our women, but not from the enemy who organizes with every intent to destroy us.
It took me awhile to understand the means of parasitism and I had to put a few of your families in prison to do so, but I did learn how it works, how it evolved, and how to end it.
So do not make excuses. I don’t make excuses for exterminating the natives, or the error of alexander crossing the bosphorus, or the celtic genocide, or the termination of west africa’s first empire, or the fragmentation and plundering of india, or the selling of drugs into china or bringing gunboats to japan. These were immoral acts and completely unnecessary – had we followed china’s strategy of building a wall we would have been better off. So, don’t make excuses for being tossed out of so many countries for your peopl”s malfeasance. Because it was earned. Many times over.
—“Debunking Paul Krugman is a little like beating up the special ed kid”– Joe Redtree
–“The Sanctuary Cities have already seceded from the government and actively violated the constitutional requirement for federal control of immigration and naturalization.”—CD
—“Calling someone a purity spiraler is the rights equivalent of calling someone a racist.”—Marie Woods
—“The non-Occidental world worshiped the moon while the Occidents walked on it.”— George Hobbs
—“In the absence of the talent of empathy for others one can only rely on empathy with the self. in the absence of education in natural law we are forced to rely on empathy. As in all things intuition does not scale beyond the trivial.”—
—“The cost of parasitism has been crashing for decades.”— Richard Nikoley
—“We just need to restore the family as the primary insurer such that people struggle to produce families as insurers rather than the state as an insurer with poor judgement.”—CD
—“The only sport left worth watching is politics, and sport left worth participating in is civil war.”—James Santagata
—“Identifying what question one attempts to answer distinguishes the meaningful from the truthful and why these are not always interchangeable.”— Bill Joslin
Um. Let me help you. This is what modern revolution looks like from the outside:
And of course, there is the alternative of the status quo.
This is what revolutionaries around the world are doing. They are not trying to get control of government and to use it for territorial expansion.
Because the era of 4GW is here, and the Peace of Westphalia has ended, and the western way of war cannot concentrate forces on men in sneakers, flip flops, among the citizenry.
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/NIAC%20Catastrophic%20Power%20Outage%20Study_508%20FINAL.pdf?NIAC Catastrophic Power Outage Study_508 FINAL
—“The NIAC was challenged to think beyond even our most severe power disruptions, imagining an outage that stretches beyond days and weeks to months or years, and affects large swaths of the country.
Unlike severe weather disasters, a catastrophic power outage may occur with little or no notice and result from myriad types of scenarios: for example, a sophisticated cyber physical attack resulting in severe physical infrastructure damage; attacks timed to follow and exacerbate a major natural disaster; a large-scale wildfire, earthquake, or geomagnetic event; or a series of attacks or events over a short period of time that compound to create significant physical damage to our nation’s infrastructure.
An event of this severity may also be an act of war, requiring a simultaneous military response that further draws upon limited resources.
For the purpose of this study, the NIAC focused not on the cause, but rather on the consequences, which are best categorized as severe, widespread, and long-lasting.
The type of event contemplated will include not only an extended loss of power, but also a cascading loss of other critical services—drinking water and wastewater, communications, financial services, transportation, fuel, healthcare, and others—which may slow recovery and impede re-energizing the grid.
Most importantly, the scale of the event—stretching across states and regions, affecting tens of millions of people—would exceed and exhaust mutual aid resources and capabilities. The ability to share public and private resources across businesses and jurisdictions underpins our nation’s emergency response plans and strategies today. (See Appendix C for a more detailed definition of a catastrophic outage).
This profound threat requires a new national focus. The NIAC found that our existing plans, response resources, and coordination strategies would be outmatched by an event of this severity.”—
(Note: Preserving a bit of history: this was our institute’s mission statement as a think tank. Our new mission as an educational institution is to distribute rather than just research.)
To convert western aristocratic egalitarian philosophy into rational and scientific terms: Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of the European Aristocratic Manorial system and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment combined with our ancient indo-european instincts for group persistence and land-holding: truth-telling, the jury, and heroism.
This philosophy – which separates the west from the rest – currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an rationally articulated philosophy expressed in scientific terms. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.
This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Propertarianism solves this problem of supplying a necessary, sufficient, and formal articulation of western aristocratic egalitarianism in ratio-scientific language, and the means by which to restore our civilization to its competitive advantage: Truth Telling Suppression of Free Riding, and The Construction of Commons, embodied a formal, logic, of law.
A Short Video Course in Human Self Domestication
Or, “It’s Just Neoteny, Stupid.” The principle difference between the macro, major, and minor races, is the degree of neoteny due to the rate and depth of maturity. Otherwise it is the developmental difference in the female (herd) or male (pack) brain structure. Videos
I recommend reading “The Accidental Superpower” by Peter Zeihan on this topic. It explains the following:
As you can see above, the United States has 15,000 miles of interconnected waterways, more than the rest of the planet put together. That’s important because moving “stuff” from point A to point B is expensive, but less expensive if you float it. That means the United States is destined to be capital rich because it’s citizenry has direct access to a lot of “stuff” at low cost.
And you see that long blue line in the picture above? That’s called the Greater Mississippi basin. It sits on the largest arable land in the entire world. Thats called the “American bread basket” and is home to a LOT of farmers. All this food is transported at low cost to Minneapolis-St. Paul or Chicago, and then transported very cheaply throughout the United States, and via Houston, the world.
Ever wonder why Americans have a tendency to be isolationist? It’s because Midwesterners don’t NEED the rest of the world. The rest of the world NEEDS us, in order to keep their food cost low so they can invest in other “stuff.” But because American food is so cheap and easily accessible, our coastal elitists can invest in other extravagant things such as industrial, technological and philosophical inventions.
This helps explain America’s leading role in the industrial and technological revolutions. America can build great universities, great cities and great militaries because the most important commodity, food and water, is heavily prevalent to Americans.
Now, I will stop harping on about food. But not only does the United States have lots of water and food, but it has four large mountain ranges with tons of raw minerals to choose from.
The Appalachian, Rockies, Nevadas, and Alaskan Ranges are home to hundreds of billions of pounds worth of bauxite, iron, gold, silver, copper, and pretty much everything you can think of. Not only that, but America also has this….
You see all that dark brown? That’s more oil and natural gas reserves than any other country on planet earth. And this doesn’t have Alaska’s ANWAR field, which may have more natural gas and oil than all of continental US put together.
This means that continental America has its own food, water, oil, natural gas, and raw minerals. In theory, we could cut ourselves off from the rest of the world, and we’d be fine (I’m not suggesting this). The rest of the world does not have that luxury.
And to top it all off, America is one of the most naturally defendable pieces of geography in the world…
America is effectively an island. It has the Atlantic to the east, the Pacific to the west, deserts protecting us from the south and forests and lakes protecting us from the north.
When America builds a military, it’s not to defend our borders, but instead to project outward our influence. Our armies and navies can go wherever and whenever it wants, and no one can do the same to us. It’s why America tends to be reckless in some of its foreign policy decisions, whereas other powers don’t have that luxury. This simple reality is why many powers become frustrated with American hegemony, because when we make a foreign policy blunder, we barely suffer any consequences. But it has an overwhelming impact on the rest of the world.
Americans are a pure settler culture. When the Industrial Revolution hit Europe, millions of poor Europeans lost their livelihoods due to a decrease in need for agricultural labor. As a consequence, millions of these Europeans flooded into America. How did America handle this?
Well, the American Anglo-Saxon elite allowed populations to come into America with the expectation that they wouldn’t be a burden on the state. These new Americans were handed a rifle, sent out West, and told to fight themselves a plot of land, cultivate it, defend it on their own, and trade it into the east coast. The only time when the US Government would get involved was if a Native Tribe was successfully repelling the process of European settlement. In that event, the US sent an overwhelming force to “neutralize” the threat. That would be the polite way to say that.
This helps explain the American culture of extreme individualism and the “leave our community alone” culture. When the Germans, Irish, or Scots settled in America, they did so as a community specific to their own. This community built their own church in their image and created a system of governance appropriate to them.
These communities were essentially Socialist networks in their make-up. These populations donated generously to the local church, at which the church used those funds to build schools and hospitals intended to be used solely by the community members. All interactions with “that town down the river” were to be strictly on the basis of trade and common defense against Natives. The most able men of these communities learned English so they had a common language to discuss trade and defense with the surrounding communities.
Understanding this process is essential to understanding how all American universities have their origins as theological institutions, intended to educate the local German or Scottish community on their historic, religious, and economic practices. Harvard, for example, was founded on behalf of Anglo-Saxon Puritan Minister John Harvard “to advance learning and perpetuate it to posterity, dreading to leave an illiterate ministry to the churches when our present ministers shall lie in the dust.” Harvard was originally intended to train Puritan ministers to preach the Gospel throughout the Anglo-Saxon colonies in 1643.
Similarly, this is why American hospitals are called by their original religious affiliation. The “Methodist Hospital,” “Lutheran Hospital” or “Presbyterian Hospital” are examples of European settlement institutions that have their origin in the “take care of your own community and your own people” mentality. This also explains America’s hesitancy to adopt more European or Canadian style healthcare, welfare, or gun policy. Each individual settlement believed in taking care of their own community, and gets frustrated when the state attempts to supersede settlement law.
While this does have its own problems, this has helped create the American entrepreneurial culture. America is home to some of the the world’s most advanced technological and industrial companies. It started as a way for the German settlement to figure out a better way to trade into the Scottish settlement down the river. It has now become “what communication method using technological software is most desirable to the consumer.”
The Angles, Saxons, Normans, Danes, Welsh, and Scots put together an impressive political structure in Greater Britain from the fall of Rome through the Magna Carta and the Glorious Revolution. An adherence to the common belief in the divinity of the individual and the respect of individual liberties, has kept the government of the United States from interfering with the development of American enterprise.
English Common Law is a byproduct of Anglo-Saxon judicial practices, Jewish theological practices via Christianity, Greek Legislative practices, and Roman organization/infrastructure. It’s combined many of the greatest political philosophies into one brilliant simple idea, espoused from the English Glorious Revolution, John Locke to Thomas Jefferson.
What makes America exceptional is a byproduct of its geography, culture, and history. It’s also what makes us despised in many parts of the world. Americans are a byproduct of Western European pioneering and conquest, with some 72–80% of our population being a descendant from Western Europe. 15% Anglo-Saxon, 15% German, 15% Hispanic (Spanish), 15% Irish, 5% Scottish, 5% Italian, 5% Scandinavian and a 5% Slavic/Balkan/Jewish admixture. It is also home to 13% African American, 4% East Asian and 2% Asian Indian/Middle Eastern. And sadly, only about 1% is Native American, once a people who solely populated this land alone.
*** Interesting facts – There are 28 million descendants of Ireland in America, almost 6 times that of the island of Ireland. There are more ethnic Greater Britons (England, Scotland and Wales) in America than in Great Britain (70–84 million vs. 66 million). More than one third of the global ethnic German population (German, Dane, Swedish, Norwegian, Austrian) lives in America. There are more ethnic Poles living in Chicago than in any other Polish city with the only exception its Capitol, Warsaw.
But in the end, it’s a land of many different cultures that settled within this divinely gifted land, and a people who learned a common language, share a common history and share a common destiny. While our history is regretful in some regards of cultural and ethnic infighting, it is an unfortunate process of forming many different cultures into one. And while our assimilation process is viewed as ugly to outsiders, it’s much more effective than any other nation to date.
It’s the individualist American ethic, founded on Judaeo-Christian Protestant Individualism, that will continue to propel our institutions to the highest competitive advantage. And for us Americans, although foreigners despise our patriotism, this is something we are very thankful for.
Look. I don’t make mistakes.
It’s my job to prosecute pseudoscience. Race denialism, is pseudoscience just, just as much as marxist economics is pseudoscience, as much as theology is pseudoscience, and just as much as postmodernism is a combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and outright denial .
The importance of race may be relative but the existence of races is an observable fact which is fairly obvious from the vast differences in our skulls that equal to the differences in the identification of everything from beetles to mammals.
Ergo if you say certain species and subspecies should be protected and do not say that the same applies to humans then you are simply engaging in fraud and deceit.
Here is a link to the full extent of known peoples, which I update to reflect each major revision in the DNA research once or twice a year. I have not updated it for 2018 findings yet.
Below is the Primate taxonomy. Taxonomy is determined by morphology (gene expression) assisting in the identification of kin groups (kin selection). In other words, morphology assists in the identification of kin, and because of kin better ability to judge the fitness of those mates. (Conversely, crossing kingroup boundaries provides the genetically UNFIT with opportunity that is not available within group. As such superior groups should logically seek to exit non-conforming members, not retain them.)
The difference between races are observable at the morphological, behavioral, aggregate behavioral, and genetic levels, but largely minor other than the fact that the size of the underclass genetic classes versus the middle genetic classes is asymmetric favoring survival under glaciation, as well as survival of winter farming, which led to greater neoteny (‘domestication’) in the far east and far west and less so in the more equatorial regions.
When we notice differences between the races we are largely noticing (and reacting to) greater and lesser degrees of neotonic evolution, and when we stereotype races we are largely noticing and reacting to the sizes of the underclasses in relation tot he middle and upper.
And when we measure the economic, political, social, and intellectual status of civilizations, races, and subraces, we are largely measuring the inability of groups to cull the size of the underclass sufficiently to produce a Pareto distribution capable of economic, political, social, and military competition with neighboring groups.
This is the science. And any contrary argument is false, lie, and fraud. Sorry.
… Genus: Pan
… … Species
… … … Pan Troglodytes ( Common Chimpanzee)
… … … Subspecies:
… … … … 1. Pan troglodytes verus
… … … … 2. P. t. ellioti
… … … … 3. P. t. troglodytes
… … … … 4. P. t. schweinfurthii
… … Species
… … … Pan Paniscus (Bonobo)
… … Species:
… … … H. sapiens (anatomically modern humans)
… … … Subspecies:
… … … … H. S. Sapiens
… … … … … Races:
… … … … … … H. S. Africanus
… … … … … … H. S. Mongoloid
… … … … … … H. S. Caucasoid
The question is only whether we are different races, subspecies, or species, since the definition of subspecies on down is determined by adaptation to geographic conditions and tendency for ingroup selection.
Since humans are happy to attempt to ‘breed with’ (euphemistically) just about anything from dogs, to sheep to donkeys, the we have only marriage selection as an equivalent test of ingroup identification among human races.