5.4.0-The Genders · Classes · Español (Spanish) · Genders · Races

Las diferencias entre familias, clanes, razas y tribus

El Problema:

La regresión constante de la calidad de los hombres por debajo de la media y las desviaciones estándar crean la necesidad para que existan presiones persistentes que mantengan una necesidad genética en los grupos humanos. Esto quiere decir que los grupos pueden perder calidad muy fácilmente en cualquier momento que permitan mezclarse entre sí o que haya un cambio en las tasas de reproducción dentro de los grupos.

Valor:

Los hombres se pueden adaptar a cualquier circunstancia sin que tengan que mutar de forma evolutiva, pero debido a la simple frecuencia en la que se expresan los caracteres de una población en un lugar, espacio y tiempo determinado en la forma que la naturaleza los requiere. Esto trae como consecuencia que el hombre sea altamente capaz de adaptarse como organismo. Nosotros nos adaptamos cuando aprendemos, por medio de normas sociales, y por tasas de reproducción entre clases. Porque las clases son y siempre han sido expresiones genéticas superior y e inferiores.

Especialización

Tal parece que todos los hombres hemos estado involucrados en el proceso de erradicar a todos los competidores del Homo sapiens sapiens, y luego nos comenzamos a subdividir en razas.
Existen cuatro razas principales: Negroide, mongoloide, caucasoide: Europeo (Del Norte, de los bosques y llanuras) Caucasoide, Iraní (sureño, del desierto y las estepas) Caucasoide y muchas otras sub razas como las semitas (africano/iraní-caucasoide) todas las cuales tuvieron que experimentar de manera directa un proceso de especialización. Las diferencias entre estas razas están descritas y son explicables desde un punto de vista endocrino, ya que los humanos “crecen” y los cambios endocrinos modifican las expresiones de ciertos caracteres, comportamientos y apariencias entre las razas.

Es por ello que:

  • La mayoría de las diferencias entre razas del Homo sapiens sapiens tienen un basamento endocrinológico.
    • Un mayor o menor dimorfismo sexual
    • Una madurez sexual mayor o menor (agresividad/impulsividad)
    • Una rapidez de maduración sexual mayor o menor (agresividad/impulsividad)
      Los asiáticos tienes una baja madurez sexual, mayor esperanza de vida, baja testosterona, les siguen los blancos, y los negros.
      Lo inverso ocurre con los (((judíos))), la exagerada masculinidad africana, la inmadurez sexual asiática, el alto dimorfismo sexual blanco y la madurez retardada del blanco.
    • Cuerpos más altos, musculosos, atractivos o más pequeños. Desarrollo de corteza cerebral mayor o menor.
    • El sexo femenino tiende a ser verbal/empático y el sexo masculino tiende a ser espacial/operacional, estas tendencias “crecen”, se desarrollan y se deben principalmente a la consecuencia del desarrollo intrauterino. Un cerebro masculino es el resultado del mismo a la exposición a la testosterona, y “crece” al desarrollar una serie de características. Es por ello que las diferencias endocrinas intrauterinas en familias pueden producir amplias variaciones de distintos caracteres en los seres humanos.
  • Algunos grupos han usado la redistribución reproductiva de la misma manera que se distribuyen los alimentos, el cuidado de los niños, mujeres y ancianos, el hogar y el techo.
    • Estos grupos han permitido dos tipos de comportamientos reproductivos: Matrimonios arreglados (con consecuencias mayoritariamente negativas) y los matrimonios por afinidad (con consecuencias mayoritariamente buenas).
    • Han prohibido matrimonios y reproducción entre primos.
    • Han permitido que los hombres y las mujeres se casen al alcanzar una madurez sexual e intelectual alta (con resultados mayoritariamente positivos para la sociedad) en contraste con las sociedades que casan a niñas de bajísima o nula madurez sexual con hombres adultos que alcanzaron una madurez sexual temprana y un desarrollo intelectual bajo/medio (con consecuencias mayoritariamente negativas, basta ver el Medio Oriente)
    • Que los cónyuges tengan propiedades (tierras) antes de contraer nupcias o que no las tengan.
    • Han desarrollado impuestos y mecanismos para las clases inferiores para que se eliminen de forma progresiva.
    • Instituyeron el Señorío y sociedades feudales, particularmente en Europa, China y Japón (o en cualquier otro sitio en donde haya habido esclavitud y servidumbre).
    • Se reguló la ingesta calórica y proteica a los jóvenes. Alterando de forma positiva o negativa el desarrollo neurobiológico en etapas críticas del crecimiento.
  • Las diferencias que quedan están en el fondo de la distribución
    • Climas fríos en donde el factor tiempo  no tiene clemencia para aquellos que son impulsivos.
    • La matanza de los niños no deseados.
    • El sacrificio de los indeseables
    • La desaparición física de los criminales
    • Condenar al ostracismo a los inútiles en sociedades agrarias.
    • La guerra en todas sus versiones históricas.

      Esto es bastante sencillo y son un juego de reglas q que no requieren experimentación genética (mutaciones) para que evolucionen las diferencias entre grupos de otra forma que no sea la expresión de caracteres.

¿Cuál es el secreto del hombre occidental entonces?

Los hombres occidentales somos los pueblos que más hemos puesto en práctica la eugenesia, “para mejorar nuestra raza”. Eso no nos hace mejores per se. Simplemente hemos matado a todos lo peor y lo malo durante tanto tiempo que muchas familias buenas y mejores tribus han surgido y sobrevivido que las tribus y familias malas.

La revolución industrial cambió todo eso

La democracia cambió esta antigua estrategia cultural porque cambiamos de una familia productiva (no sólo un hombre) un voto, a votos igualitarios para todos – y desde que las mujeres se volvieron reproductivamente irresponsables (disgénicas) y las clases bajas se volvieron reproductivamente dañinas (disgénicas también), y juntos esos dos factores son más numerosos pero no superiores en calidad, implementaron políticas que revirtieron la excelencia genética que alguna vez tuvo Occidente.

Hemos experimentado una “explosión” (efecto Flynn) que luce estadísticamente como un dispositivo que mejora la nutrición y distribución de las clases inferiores. Sin embargo este efecto puede ser neutralizado (revertido) ya que las tasas de reproducción de las clases inferiores continúan en expansión. Es probable que la tasa reproductiva de las clases inferiores disminuya conforme los caracteres genéticos negativos continúen perpetúandose, pero eso es cuestión de un número no determinado de generaciones y mutaciones indeterminadas.

Es así de sencillo

Es necesario poner en práctica políticas de eugenesia.
No se puede tener libertad y prosperidad si no se tiene una civilización eugénica y racialmente homogénea.

2.1-Biology · 2.3-Psychology · 2.4-Sociology · Races

The Subtle Cause Of Differences In Races And Tribes

The ethnically Dutch are definitely the ‘master tribe’ by any empirical measure. The ethnically north sea (Danes, Swedes, Norwegians, Finns and North Germans) are an obvious distance behind.

If for no other reason than there is greater territorial distance between them and the less evolved people (resistance to invasive genes), and the difficulty of surviving long winters ( selection ), and the combination of late marriage, voluntary mate selection, and near breeding (selection), culling (hanging, starvation, and war).

The celts ( my mother’s relations, and that of most of Britons ) get to ride-along like the Franks, and the eastern Europeans. But its pretty simple really: Selective breeding over longer periods of time with less of the genes from the sunshine latitudes.

Evolution progresses upward under lower population density and dysgenia spreads in high population density. This is fairly obvious but that there should be a balance in order to preserve the human condition is something that limits us, and we dislike it.

Someone sent me a map the other day, that showed genders of western Europeans (r1b, r1a) to be about equally attractive on average(forests: cattle farmers), eastern European females on average to be more attractive than males (Polish Ukrainian Russian), and, along with the increase in black hair, southeastern europeans to be less attractive on average, and middle easterners (turks, iranians, Jews, and Arabs) to be much less attractive on average. This assessment does not include north Africans, black Africans, the caucasian people of India, or the east and southeast Asians.

But if I look at it as a very simple question of (a) degree of sexual immaturity or maturity, (b) degree of sexual dimorphism, then these two axes reflect both differences in testosterone and estrogen, and differences in sexual maturity.

– Southeast Asians have lower sexual maturity, lower sexual dimorphism that’s slanted female. High inequality of desirability between women and men.

– East Asians have lower sexual maturity and lower sexual dimorphism, slanted female. High inequality of desirability between women and men.

– Eastern and Southern Slavs have lower sexual maturity, (hence the jawline), and higher female dimorphism. Women slightly more desirable than men.

– Germanic Whites have lower sexual maturity (prolonged adolescence) and higher sexual dimorphism. Men and women equally desirable.

– The Iranian/jewish branch (vs the celt/germanpolish/ukrainian
branch), and the arab and berber branches, have higher sexual maturity but level sexual dimorphism. (male emotionalism, females with strong male features). Men more desirable than women.

– The black africans have very high and fast sexual maturity, superior strength and agility. and masculine slanted sexual dimorphism. High inequality of desirability between women and men.

CAN TWO AXIS EXPLAIN ALMOST EVERYTHING?

Lets illustrate using two well-understood extremes: female solipsism and male autism. Women tend toward the solipsistic and men the autistic. Men tend toward the spatio-physical(models and systems), and women to the verbal (individuals and experiences). Rates of maturity reduce time in childhood and adolescence for learning. Rates of maturity increase impulsivity. Search for novelty increases

THE DATA

We see this in the desirability of mates on dating and social sites from around the world, and we have such enormous amounts of data now from demonstrated preferences that these questions are no longer hypothetical, but now require refutation that will be difficult to determine.

WHY DO WE SELECT FOR THESE TRAITS?

Women select poorly by instinct, and men are not terribly selective at all. Women are attracted to that which they understand, men what visual signs of fertility that they can observe. Marriage and reduction of insurance by the tribe force men and women to mate on long-term survival grounds, rather than on our sexual impulses – which at least for women, do not assist us in collecting desirable traits in civilization. And men are not discriminate enough to select without marriage.

Taller, more symmetrical, fairer, and all other signs of ‘health’ like hair, skin, head size. But we have to be able to survive our environments with those traits. Africa and high conflict areas need masculine traits, some ver hot areas smaller size, and the polar regions feminine traits are more beneficial, and survivable.

It’s no secret any longer that there is a difference between how we perceive aspirational beauty (tall blondes) and reproductive frequency (petite brunettes). The petite brunettes have more offspring. And they appear to be far more loyal. And men are more willing to work for them.

THE RESOURCE CURSE

The discovery of fossil fuels for the purpose of creating electricity has been a quality of life improvement, but expanded dysgenia in cold climates to match that in warm climates.

Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Somewhere on planet earth.

Classes · Genders · Races · Uncategorized

Differences in Families, Clans, Tribes, Nations, Races

Working theory:

PROBLEM
Constant regression toward the mean creates the need for persistent pressures to maintain a genetic advantage in the group. Meaning that groups can regress easily at any point through admixture, or shifting of rates of reproduction within the group.

VALUE
Man can adapt to any circumstance without requiring evolutionary mutation, but due simply to the frequency of expression of traits in a population as they are needed. This produces an extremely adaptive organism. We adapt by learning, by social norms, and by rates of reproduction between the classes. Because classes are, and always have been, superior and inferior genetic expressions.

SPECIATION
Yes, it appears that we have been in the process of first eradicating all competitors to homo sapiens sapiens, then through our races beginning to speciate. There are four major races: negroid, mongoloid, Caucasoid: European (northern/forest/plain) Caucasoid, Iranian (southern/desert/steppe) Caucasoid, and many sub-races within them such as Semitic(african/iranian-caucusoid), all of which had begun to speciate. But these differences are explicable as endocrinal, since humans are ‘grown’ and modifying endocrinal expressions produces the differences in the behavior (and look) of the races.

THEREFORE
1) Most evolutionary differences in the races of homo sapiens are endocrinal.
…a) Greater or less sexual dimorphism
…b) Greater or less sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity)
…c) Faster or slower sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity)
(Asians low sexual maturity, longer lifespans, low testosterone, followed by whites in the middle, and people of color much higher))
(jewish sexual reversal, African exaggerated masculinity, Asian sexual immaturity, white high sexual dimorphism and delayed maturity)
…d) Bigger(more expensive/hotter) or smaller(less expensive/cooler) bodies and brains.
…e) Female verbal/empathic and male spatial/operational tendencies are ‘grown’ and largely the result of in-utero development. A male brain is essentially ‘damaged’ by testosterone, and then the remaining brain ‘grows’ by exaggerating a minority of characteristics. Egro endocrinal differences in utero in families can produce wide variations in human traits)

2) Next, some groups have used upward redistribution of reproduction by the upward distribution of food, care, and shelter, and the downward distribution of stresses.
…a) Assortative (voluntary) mate selection (good) vs arranged marriages (bad)
…b) the prohibition (good) on close cousin marriage (very bad).
…c) late marriage (good) vs early marriage (bad)
…d) property requirement before marriage (good) or not (bad)
…e) ‘taxing’ the underclass so that they bear the brunt of starvation, illness, hard physical labor, and accumulated cellular damage.
…f) Manorialism – particularly in Europe and china/japan. (or anywhere there was slavery or serfdom) combines all these features.
…g) (and underrated:) high rates of child and infant mortality dependent largely on caloric intake and stresses.

3) The remaining differences are in culling the bottom of the distribution.
…a) cold climates where long time preference is required are unforgiving to the impulsive.
…b) exposure (killing) of unwanted children
…a) Sacrificing the undesirable.
…b) Hanging/burning/strangling, the undesirable, criminal.
…c) Ostracizing the undesirable under agrarianism (a death sentence)
…b) War in all its historical versions.

This is a pretty simple set of rules that does not require any material genetic experimentation (mutation) in order to evolve differences between groups other than by the expression of traits.

THE SECRET OF WESTERN MAN?
We’re the most eugenic peoples ever. We aren’t better per se. We’ve just successfully killed off all the worst for so long that far more good families, clans, and tribes survive than bad families.

THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION CHANGED ALL THAT
because we could now profit from organizing production and selling to the underclasses, rather than profiting from upward redistribution away from the underclasses.

UNIVERSAL DEMOCRACY CHANGED ALL THAT
Democracy changed this ancient culture strategy because we changed from one productive family (not one man) one vote, to equal votes for all – and since women are reproductively irresponsible (dysgenic), and the lower classes reproductively damaging(dysgenic), and together are more numerous, they implemented policies that reversed western genetic exceptionalism.

We have experienced a temporary ‘burst’ (Flynn effect) which appears to me (statistically) to be an artifact of improving the nutrition of the bottom, and the distribution of scientific (a few general rules) rather than recipes (many specific rules). But this effect will be neutralized (reversed), as the rates of reproduction of the underclasses continue to expand. (There is some promise that all the underclasses will slow reproduction, but this appears to be an artifact of the right-distribution of prior generations, and it’s going to disappear also).

IT’S REALLY THAT SIMPLE.
You cannot have liberty and prosperity unless you have eugenic civilization.