1.6-The Pattern of History · 2.8-Evolution · 3.7-Evolutionary Strategy · Uncategorized

The Future Is A Choice: Choose to Rule

THE FUTURE IS JUST A CHOICE. RETURN TO OUR MAJOR INDUSTRY: RULE.

We could take a very different perspective: “They are our minorities. They are our Africans, our Jews, our Caribbeans, our Mestizos. We have paid a high price for them. Under the right circumstances they make excellent wage labor. All we must do is return to our ancient industry of Ruling the Lesser Peoples. It is an industry we excel at and have profited from for thousands of years – much to the benefit of not only the ruled but all mankind. To rule for profit is just a choice. But to make that choice we must admit that our ancestors the aristocracy were right and we were wrong.”

You see, the future is just a choice. Rule and profit. Or be rule parasitically.

2.8-Evolution · Sequences · Uncategorized

Comparative Religion: Group Strategies

Nov 18, 2016 6:37am

1) Aryan Expansion of sovereignty, domestication, and invention.(E)
2) (Reformed) Christian expansion of duty, trust, and production.(E)
3) Jewish expansion of separatism, deceit, and parasitism.(E/D)
4) Marxist expansion of rebellion, pseudoscience, and parasitism.(D)
5) Islamic expansion of submission, ignorance, and predation. (D)

(E: eugenic/domestication. D:dysgenic/un-domestication. E/D: internal eugenic and external dysgenic)

2.8-Evolution · Uncategorized

Cultural Differences

CURT AND MURRAY SELL ON CULTURAL DIFFERENCES

—“The Chinese [primary method of decidability] is stability – [non-conflict]. Chinese history is tumultuous so everything must be done in the name of maintaining equilibrium and stability in the nation state(which is seen as a collective entity).

The American [primary method of decidability] (until very recently) is reason – [negotiation]. Maintaining that people will ultimately do what’s right for themselves in the end and will act in their own self interests.

(CURT INTERJECTS: Chinese prevent conflict through denial, delay, and deceit. westerners attempt to expose conflicts and resolve them quickly. europeans regulate heavily to prevent legal conflicts later. Americans provide very precise legal rules so that limited regulation is necessary except in those cases where the exceptions have failed. These are three methods of insurance against conflict. The Chinese delay and deceive and deny until ‘matters solve themselves’. The continental method of regulate in order to limit conflicts. And the anglo method: provide clear rule of law so that those conflicts that do arise are decidable.)

It’s probably why our greatest weapon has been unleashing chaos into societies (weaponized culture)in order to drive events in a way that serve America’s greater interests.

(CURT INTERJECTS: Americans have followed the anglo enlightenment, peace of Westphalia(States are responsible for all agents within), and Postwar Consensus (human rights and fixed borders), that the world will remain peaceful through economic cooperation rather than territorial expansion. So americans seek to raise in to ‘adulthood’ every nation, so that it can participate in a meritocratic international market. This is ok, except that every nation may not have the human capital to compete successfully, and may try to circumvent that meritocratic competition by other means (islam).)

I feel like this idea failed with the Middle Eastern destabilization program of the obama administration. The realization that people are literally wired differently from the western mind I feel is a revelatory moment of catharsis for western neoliberal thinkers. Universalism is a generic lazy way of seeing collective groups of people on earth. I have watched lectures on YouTube from the army war college stating that it doesn’t really matter if we technically “lose” wars with other nation states (fail to hold territory). As long as we utterly destroy your nation and knock it back a century in its progress we have technically won against our opponent because they can’t develop a civilization strong enough to challenge us on our own territory. The third world is aware of this and some folks theorize that we are in a multigenerational asymmetric conflict with the devolving world using our own principles and mass migration (another form of warfare) against us…”— Murray Sell

(CURT INTERJECTS: agreed)

2.8-Evolution · 5.7.2-The Reformation of Religion

An Objective Analysis Of Cultural Philosophies

Ill give you the objective model instead:

1-utopians(plato)(hindus),

  • The Utopian strategy is train men to be good,  so that no conflict need occur.

2-truth tellers (aristotle),

  • The Aryan strategy is to resolve conflicts early and quickly so that they cannot be seized in a moment of weakness.

3-truth avoiders (sun tsu),

  • Sun Tzu is the first philosopher of china. His message is to avoid conflict by use of delay and deceive until you can seize an opportunity in your opponent’s moment of weakness.

4 – The Truth Benders (russia)

  • The Russian strategy is to exaggerate moral hazard, as an excuse to accumulate defenses, then seize territory in a moment of weakness.

4-liars (abraham),

  • The Judaic strategy is to use suggestion to create moral hazard, and then seize the weakness once it (deterministically) occurs.

5-lying+ignorance(muhammed)

  • The Muslim strategy is to wear down the weak and overwhelm them in their moment of greatest weakness.
2.8-Evolution

The Different Conflict Strategies of Different Cultures

  • Sun Tzu is the first philosopher of china. His message is to avoid conflict by use of delay and deceive until you can seize an opportunity in your opponent’s moment of weakness. (strong but beset by many enemies)
  • The Aryan strategy is to resolve conflicts early and quickly so that they cannot be seized in a moment of weakness. (strong but small in number)
  • the jewish strategy is to use suggestion to create moral hazard, and then seize the weakness once it (deterministically) occurs. ( weak and necessarily parasitic)
  • The russian strategy is to exaggerate moral hazard, as an excuse to accumulate defenses, then seize territory in a moment of weakness. (strong, beset by many enemies, but not trusting of each other or leadership)
  • the muslim strategy is to wear down the weak and overwhelm them in their moment of greatest weakness. ( poor, disorganized, untrusting, but large in number)
1.7-The Solution (Promise) · 2.8-Evolution · 6.1.1-Cosmopolitanism (Judaism) · Uncategorized

You Want Me To Say Something Both Offensive And True?

You want me to say something offensive? Ok. How’s this: what’s a greater crime? The holocaust (the forcible deportation to of a gypsies, jews, and other non-conformists) or the inventions of the infantilizing lies of the Abrahamic religions and Cosmopolitan pseudoscience? (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno+Co, Rothbard/Rand, Straussian Neo-Conservatism, Feminism, Postmodernism, and “Political Correctness”?)

What has caused more harm to mankind? It’s not even worth discussing. And after the west rescues the disenfranchised, what do they do? They struggle to destroy it by turning our high trust homogenous polity into another failed Levantine catastrophe.

THE UTOPIA CANNOT EXIST
We either create small prosperous redistributive high trust homogenous states, or we create a large corrupt low trust poor caste system.

There is no alternative.

1.6-The Pattern of History · 2.8-Evolution · Definitions

Definition: Paedomorphic Evolution

It’s called Paedomorphic Evolution: Genetic Pacification selecting for lower maturity – the “juvenile”. One of which is Gracilization: loss of bone mass. The ‘strange’ sexual interests of the Japanese (and the asians) and our men’s attraction to Asian women, is very likely due to the greater paedomorphism of the asians and the lower levels of testosterone. The east and the west have been engaging in genetic pacification over a long long time. The rest of the world has not. Because they were unable to reduce the bottom population.