Healthcare and Other Services

My Position On The Solution to Healthcare

(regarding the republican failure to reform healthcare)


Are you speaking truthfully, with bias, with wishful thinking, or propagandizing (fictionalizing)?

1 – they (mainstream republicans) thought they could replace it in name only.
2 – the right libertarians and conservatives that were elected to repeal it completely put together enough votes to block it.
3 – Now it will fail economically, and they will allow it to fail, and the right and the mainstream republicans will say ‘told you so’ – and they will solidify the movement of the middle class to the republican party permanently.
4 – The left will (as they intended originally) to propose full nationalization upon failure.
5 – The right will propose a tiered program (extending the two tiered system we have today: medicare and private.)
6 – the uninformed (unaligned) voter will provide marginal voting power to one party or another depending upon the timing.
7 – the outcome then is random, dependent upon the economic mood of the country.

My opinion remains, and has been, to keep and expand the subsidy (medicare, medicaid) system for the poor, cover catastrophic health problems fully (for the lower middle and middl) and leave market plans available for the upper middle and upper classes. This three tiered system allows the governments (states) to negotiate price controls for the poor, the middle class to obtain insurance at reasonable prices by eliminating the high cost outliers, and the upper classes to fund research and development as they always have.

This is, I am fairly certain, the optimum system that preserves the benefits of the market on one hand, the control of prices across that market on the other, and the ability to create demand for innovative (risky, expensive) services that respond to market demands.


Criticisms of the Left · Eli Harman

The Incentives of Leftist Parasites

By Eli Harman

Why are leftists and social justice warriors so immune to facts, logic, and arguments?
It’s because social justice warriors are lying, parasitic, pieces of shit.

The aim of lying about equality, is to force transfers and redistribution from the more equal, to the less, including the extension of trust, that will be abused, and the extension of opportunity, which will not be fully realized.

All of this is costly, so it represents a parasitic burden on the people forced to provide it.

The assumption of that burden, and its maintenance, are compelled and enforced by shaming, scolding, nagging, gossip, rallying, all the “feminine means of coercion,” all the tools of moral, social, and economic, ostracism that can be mustered and deployed to raise the cost of disagreement or dissent rather than address the points of contention in good faith.

But because this wholesale plunder and parasitism through fraud creates great boons for its beneficiaries, and salves their fragile egos, they will fight tooth and nail to protect it.

And on account of the proceeds of this parasitic plunder and fraud, reliable pawns for leftist elites are bought and paid for; the lynch pin of their demographic and democratic dominance; which they are not willing and not able to maintain by keeping pace with conservatives reproductively.

There are nearly insoluable conflicts of interests here that can only be resolved, at the very least, by the physical removal of millions, and the vigorous, violent, and proactive production and supply of incentives, against engaging in dysgenic parasitism, plunder, and fraud.

Otherwise it’s too profitable. It will be done. And the more it is done, and the longer it is done, the costlier it will be either to continue, or to stop; for the cost of either can only ever grow, until the final reckoning, and the final toll is paid (whichever way it is paid…)

Criticisms of the Left · The New Right

The Racist Paul Krugman – Wishing White People Dead Even Sooner

(profound) (read) (share)

—“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman

Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor?

Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it?

Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to?

Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition?

Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital?

Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms?

You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold?

What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)?

We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents?

If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech.

If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then.

Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction?

With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right?

We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman.

There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law.

Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science.

Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience.

And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit.

And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital.

And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries.

I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold.


Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.

Criticisms of the Left · The New Right

On CalExit

The International challenges we face are due to our status as empire. End the empire, focus on local culture and people. Secede.

The only value of Geographic scale is the military tax base. The USA is not a country it is an empire. End it. Devolve to Regions.

There is no advantage to territorial scale if different regions cannot pursue cultural and legal preferences that they seek.

The USA has two strategies to avoid civil war: exit California and leave the rest, or exit Texas and take heartland with it.

Without California and Quebec, both the USA and Canada would remain Nationalist, ‘Heartland’ nations.

California does the same damage to the rest of American that Quebec does to the rest of Canada. Not all compromises are beneficial.

Women, Men, Relationships

The Continental Marriage is Better

Male-Female Relationship lessons learned from Ukraine.

1 – Men are barely tamed gorillas. Love them. Feed them. F– them. If necessary dress them.

2 – Women are incomprehensible. Their job is to love. Love them. Supply them. Make them feel safe.

3 – No talk of equality or how we should behave. No trying to train or change each other. No criticizing men for gorilla-ing, and no criticizing women for loving.

Their system is better. No Question. That’s why they’re so poor but still so wonderful. That’s why we’re so broken. We ended the contract between men and women. Men are not women. Women are not men. And any pretense of otherwise is just a lie to perpetuate a fraud, by which to steal, instead of trade.

That’s what I learned.

The Infantile Generation · The New Right

The ‘Talk’: Why Are We Stooping To The Left’s Level

Nov 11, 2016 11:06pm

In person i am a gentleman. but i learned a lot from Hayek’s pristine, gentlemanly, german failure with Keynes: never give the enemy an inch out of grace.

we aren’t Victorians. this is a street fight. a brawl. and i use broken bottles, brass knuckles, clubs, knives, guns, and every other weapon I can get my hands on. And so do all of us in the various New Right groups.

When the left, via Alinsky, took the battle to the streets, they broke with our ancient european tradition and adopted the techniques of the peasantry.

that’s’ all well and good for them – until they realized in this election that we gave up on our Victorianism and stooped to their level.

And the alt right beat them to a bloody pulp at their own game.

Now I am in the process of eviscerating every bit of leftist pseudoscience written in the past 150 years. It will take me a while to build the 100 or so people that can construct propertarian arguments but at that point we are the equivalent of the anti-frankfurt school.

And so forgive me if I frequently digress from stoic analytic purity and go slumming, seeking street fights with the left’s kleptocracy of deceit.

But I’m looking for skulls to drink from.

You, the left, thought you were winning rather than that we were just biding our time, hoping you would learn. Sorry. You didn’t learn. We are failed parents and you’re the family black sheep. You’re the alcoholic, the drug user, the impulsive criminal, and the sociopath. and the social-climbing daughter. That’s all. A cult of kleptocracy.

So, We don’t want your consent, your agreement, your approval, or your opinion. We want your silence, submission, punishment, eviction, or death. Which of those we levy against you dependent upon your choice of silence, departure, or death.

You cannot meet us on the field of truth.
You cannot meet us on the field of propaganda.
You cannot meet us on the field of war.

You can only meet us in the market of voluntary exchanges. Because that is the only field we will leave you.

So we have a message for you: productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange between the classes or it is easier, and cheaper to return you to servitude, serfdom or slavery.

You are weaker. You will always be weaker.

And we know this. And so do you.

You’re done. There won’t be another election for you to win.

Because you taught us that you are not ready for adulthood, nor liberty, nor peerage.