It’s Time to Choose Our Future


The female of our species, or more correctly, the female mind in our species, is extremely susceptible to individual psychosis and solipsism, and even more so, herd panic, trend and consensus; and verbalizing those behaviors by drama, outburst, disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction that never ceases.

This is the reason why women’s testimony has been discounted throughout history; why the cancer of abrahamism was spread through women; why women defected against their men and their civilization yet again, to feminism-postmodernism; and why there are continuous calls for “women must be heard”; and then, not surprisingly, counter-to-all-evidence that “women must be believed”. The female lacks the degree of male agency because she is more dependent upon the panic of herd than the hunting of the pack.

It is rather obvious that once given the franchise under the presumption of agency, that women took out their anger on the church in europe, and on men in america. It’s rather obvious that as much as marxism was designed to appeal to and rally men at the bottom, that feminism and postmodernism were designed to appeal to and rally women as was christianity. It is rather obvious that women’s urge to nest and preen are more easily manipulated by advertising marketing and media.

But Truth is Truth. The feminine mind lacks agency regardless of the sex of its bearer. And we cannot both preserve our civilization which is the originator of truth, reason, science, and all that comes from it by once again submitting to the herd of the female in this modern era as we did in the ancient.

“Herd Panic”, and “herd consensus”, as well as the series solipsism, psychosis, and disapproval, shaming, ridicule, outburst, rallying gossiping and reputation destruction as a means of obscuring the truth due to lack of agency and fear of falling out of sync with the herd, must become part of our conscious vocabulary and argument such that we bring the distinction between lack of agency, falsehood and fear, versus agency, truth and reason.

Lacking agency means you are not yet human and therefore not worthy of or capable of reciprocity any more than is a child – but require parenting.

It is truth that in modernity we have greater prosperity and as such greater ability to absorb the damage of the feminine mind than in the past. But that reservoir is not limitless.

That same prosperity however does leave us a choice: we can oppress one another, or we can revolt and separate, and develop feminine (failing) dysgenic orders and return to the animals and another dark age, or masculine competitive eugenic orders, that will continue our transcendence.

It’s time to choose which of those consequences we will pursue.


The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F)


The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F)

1) (M) Negative Freedom (Liberty) vs (F) Positive Freedom

2) (M) Reciprocity (Fairness) vs (F) Proportionality(Equality): rendering justice according to shared rules; opposite of cheating

3) (M) Defense (Negative) vs (F) Care (Positive): cherishing and protecting others; opposite of harm

4) (M) Loyalty vs (F) Devotion(Ingroup): standing with your family, group, nation; opposite of betrayal.

5) (M) Authority vs (F) Respect: submitting to tradition and legitimate authority; opposite of subversion

6) (M) Sanctity vs (F) Purity: abhorrence for disgusting things, foods, actions; opposite of degradation.
(M) Absorb Cellular Damage. (F) Limit Cellular Damage

Differences Are in Cognitive Load


—“there are no differences between Blacks and Whites on four of the seven personality constructs. Blacks are slightly more extroverted and emotionally stable, and Whites are slightly more agreeable. … (but) differences in the Big 5 are moderated by the cognitive loading of the personality scales.”— Tate and McDaniel [1]

The Economics of White Privilege

by Eli Harman

Critics note that white privilege is unearned & conclude that it is therefore undeserved. But I have to pay for my white privilege, when it is extended to me, by not abusing it. E.g. if I’m not followed around by security, I’m being given an opportunity to steal.

To maintain my white privilege of not being followed by security, for myself and others, I have to pay the *opportunity cost* of foregoing opportunities to steal. Evidence suggests that enough white people are willing to pay for this privilege, in this way, to maintain it.

Some groups aren’t willing to forego opportunities to steal reliably enough to make the privilege of not being followed around by security worth giving them. By whining about white people getting this privilege (saying it’s unfair) they’re trying to obtain it at a discount.

The demand is basically that whites conduct all business and interactions with non-whites on ingroup terms. But this is not worthwhile if they are not ingroup, and won’t treat us as ingroup, by the standards we demand of ingroup members. It’s a parasitic demand.

The only other way to be uniform and “fair” (as these parasites define fairness) would be to conduct business & interactions w/*everyone* (even fellow whites) on low trust, out-group terms (have security follow everyone) but this is not optimal. It’s costlier for ingroup members.

I didn’t “earn” my white privilege. But I do pay for it, every time I am extended it and don’t abuse it, such as when I am not followed by security and nevertheless refrain from stealing. Payment of those *opportunity costs* is what maintain that privilege for myself and others.

Are all whites trustworthy and all non-whites untrustworthy? Certainly not. But it certainly pays to employ different risk management strategies with different groups, according to the risks, statistically, that they present. Accordingly, different out-groups get different terms.

Asians get better out-group terms in white societies than blacks, & whites get better out-group terms in Asian societies than blacks, even if none get ingroup terms, because whites and Asians are lower risk and higher benefit, relative to blacks. It’s not just ingroup/out-group.

There are 2 kinds of blacks who object to being mistrusted, the untrustworthy, b/c it makes it harder to abuse trust, & the trustworthy, for whom it’s costly & embarrassing to be lumped w/the former. But if we can’t tell the difference, demanding not to be lumped is unreasonable.

There are 3 main, honest, productive, ways to minimize the cost of being associated with an untrustworthy group.

1) Signal, with speech, dress, mannerisms, etc, to distinguish & differentiate yourself.

2) Offer more positive value.

3) Suppress the parasitism of your own group.

Don’t demand ingroup terms from outgroups. It is NEVER worthwhile to extend you those terms, and those demands are always dishonest and parasitic. But by employing the methods above, you can obtain better out-group terms from others for your group.

Finally, it’s worth mentioning that ingroups and out-group are generally defined according to kinship because closer kinship makes trust and altruism, the mechanisms of ingroup privilege, evolutionarily self enforcing (they reward and propagate other instances of your genes.)

Conversely, kinship also makes defection, non performance, & irreciprocity (the basic mechanisms of out-group parasitism) evolutionarily unstable & self-punishing (they punish & therefore diminish & handicap other instances of your own genes.) This is why ingroup is kingroup.

A New Constitution of Natural Law

—“Transcendence and Immortality through Excellence, Beauty, Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, and Markets for association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, and polities.”—

—“Revolt, Separate, Specialize, Prosper, Speciate, and Transcend Animal Man.”—



The Conflict of Our Time

reciprocity and hierarchy of the pack vs equality of the herd

The Great Fight Renewed (semitic vs european)

And no man or men may make a choice to favor cult or corporation over kin without act of genocide, culture-cide, civilization-cide for which the only recourse and restitution is retaliation by and of the same.


Our goals are:

  • The incremental evolution of our laws such that we suppress and reverse the institutionalization of the arts of lying that produced the abrahamic dark ages  in the ancient world, and the horrors of communism, socialism, feminism, and postmodernism and their cults in the modern.
  • The equalization of suppression of soft and hard powers of coercion.
  • The extensions of involuntary warranty from goods and services to information and speech.
  • The cessation, reversal, and restitution for  the cumulative rent seeking in all aspects of life;
  • The cessation of organization by the maximization of consumption at the expense of individual, family, nation, the joy of civic life, and the accumulated inheritances from the inventions, labors, and arts of our our ancestors, and restoration of the construction of civic society’s emphasis on commons rather than consumption.
  • The redistribution of coercion, influence, commerce, rights of free association and dissociation, and rights of self determination by the devolution of the federal government into an insurer of last resort, and the restoration of the sovereignty of and alliance of the states;
  • The cessation of the exploitation of the people for purposes of creating and preserving an empire and the state bureaucracy that is counter to the interests of the people.
  • The cessation, reversal, and restitution for the attempt to genocide against our people, our nation, our race; our culture; our government, and our civilization;
  • The restoration of our right to self determination;
  • The restoration of our ancestral rights of sovereignty, and our civilizational strategy of competition and evolution by means of truth, duty, reciprocity, rule of law, markets of voluntary cooperation in all walks of life, and our ability to produce high trust civic commons.


To achieve these goals we submit these truths to a candid world.

Continue reading

The Course of The Coming Revolution


The legislature and the courts have determined:

(a) that the social, economic, and political capital costs, are inferior to the social, economic, and political gains of, enforcing:

(b) that the right of free speech, and in particular, political speech, supersedes anyone’s approval or disapproval of that speech, and the costs and consequences of permitting such speech;

(c) and we must not exclude others from association, transit, proximity, employment, residency, goods, services, and information those whom we would otherwise choose to;

(d) whether or not we prefer to ostracize, suppress, or not subsidize their presence, behavior, costs, or consequences; as familial, social, economic, political, normative, traditional, religious, informational, demographic, and genetic competitors;

(e) when and if those others are members of a protected class granted special privileges where those privileges prohibit, suppression ostracization, and non-subsidy;

(f) of that which is inherited rather than chosen (race, sex, creed or class);

(g) but these privileges do not extend to not protection from exclusion by political affiliation;

(h) despite that political affiliation is empirically an expression of race, sex, creed and class; for the purpose of familial, social, economic, political, religious, and demographic competition;

(h) despite the fact that when the market for association and disassociation is suppressed, that the only solution to accumulated conflict is political action; and if the market for political action fails to resolve the conflict; that the only remaining market is that of insurrection, revolution, and civil war;

Continue reading

Notes: Jordan Peterson and Jonathan Haidt


1) You (and jonathan) are correct that the internet has had the suggested effect, but incorrect that it has created a false impression. Instead, we all have a much more HONEST and UNFILTERED view of each group’s narrative and ambitions when absent curation by filters. The fact that you’re discounting this is rather odd, and I’ll expand this in a moment.

2) Pinker’s work misses (or artfully avoids the fact) that while violence has seemingly decreased, it has simply moved from physical attack on physical property to financialization and political parasitism that has redistributed middle and working class reproduction familial insurance, and retirement to the underclass and immigrants, and destroyed the nuclear family central to the USA’s groups strategy by malincentives in the name of virtues.

3) The principle problem in primary education is that the differences between racial groups is largely one of neotonic evolution in response to geographic demands. And that we mature at different rates, some faster and some slower, and that the rates of aggression and sensitivity to existential differences in irreversible sexual, social, economic, political, and market value come into play at different times, to different intensities. One cannot have any knowledge of the classroom and understand the violence that children are exposed to. Compare this to my current home in Ukraine where the homogeneity of the 1950’s is everywhere and conformity mandated everywhere, and civility still exists, despite being the only poor european country remaining. As far as I know the bottom has been repaired to wealth, health and nutrition and the Flynn effect is reversing. Why? It is more important to remove negative influences than try to create positive influences. We have lost vast portions of the always-troublesome white laboring and working classes to malincentives already.

4) The university isn’t as much a problem as pseudoscience: teach basic accounting, credit, micro and macro economic principles so that people undrestand the world we live in and why no alternative is possible. The university does not teach that the principle problem of differences in national income have to do with (a) degree of homogeneity, and (b) size of the underclass vs the middle class. Lastly is to cut the pseudosciences that women in particular create demand for, in exchange for vast student debt and no increase in calculative capacity.

5) The right does not see eugenic organization of society as oppression but domestication of humans just like all other animals and plants. Western civilization has been aggressively eugenic for all of its recorded history, with no myth of equality whatsoever. Limiting the damage of the bottom is seen as a necessary good. (The male reproductive strategy, versus the left’s female reproductive strategy.)

6) Neither of you take the position that just as the scandinavians naturally diverge in specialization under equality of choice and opportunity rather than converge, (despite being tiny homogenous 5-10m populations), that in larger groups it is in the intersets of groups of separate interests of separate strategies, to separate and produce norms, traditions, commons, and institutions, that are preferable for each group.

7) The Jewish question is driven almost entirely by (a) the jewish continuous advocacy for leftism and records of what they have done elsewhere, (b) activism in the process of undermining the constitution as a document of reciprocity (natural law) by selective advancement of cases before the court, and activism in suppression of western identitarianism (SPLC), (b) dominance in media and entertainment, and (c) demonstrated superiority at extemporaneous discourse in an era of high demand for extemporaneous speech in the media. It’s very easy to survey any publication for ant-white posts and determine the ethnicity of the authors, and this drives the perception. The use of argumentative techniques of poly-ethicalism, ir-reciprocity, relativism, combined with shaming, rallying, gossip, and reputation destruction, and of Pilpul(sophism) and Critique(straw manning extension of rallying shaming etc);

8) The right is terribly empirical AND hyperbolic in its interpretation of empirical evidence. The denial of HBD, the Negative consequences of diversity, the reality of IQ and the value of every single point of IQ in the standard of living of the people, the uniqueness of high trust in northern europeans, the general hostility against white people is endemic. (Moreover, you are mistaken about the percentage of the population that is aggressively advancing revolutionary activism. It’s just underground, and like all underground movements produces status signaling as a reward for participants. (The zero turnout in DC was by design.))

9) There is no evidence that the mutli-culturalism in this country will succeed any more than hit has in any other region, particularly the middle east, south america, india, and africa – or europe for that matter. All data I know of says it INCREASES DEMAND FOR AUTHORITARIANISM, which, as I understand it, is, and has been, the left’s objective.

10) Peoples demonstrate kin selection except at the top, are more dependent on shared information and the discounts on kin vs non-kin cooperation at the bottom, differ in the distribution of the two traits most influential in social, economic, political, and technological development. Those of us in the high standard deviations from the mean are too insulated from the perceptions of common people – and the relative immutability of those perceptions as necessary for preservation of their will to continue to act in service of themselves and others.

11) Outside of china there is no evidence that the human capital reserves that existed prior to 1900, exist any longer, and the period by which a backward State could use pre-existing western technology and local resources to leverage a growth of the middle class has passed. (Note: I do not understand why chinese intelligence doesn’t pay the rural IQ cost like the rest of us, or if there is something in the collection of data or effect of literacy in character memorization that I don’t understand.).

12) The value of women added to the economy has been completely absorbed by increases in taxation. Ergo we have merely engaged in reproductive redistribution, and to the right wing white male, that just translates into genocide. Which is what is driving the right. “We were too kind, and let them win. With just that one law under johnson, they lied and we let them win.”

My observation of both of you which is my observation of most people in the academy, is that understanding of economics in incentives, in behavior, in the micro economics that are perceptible to each of us, and macro economics that are not observable are counter to our intuitions, is as necessary a method of cognition as reading and mathematics, and that programming, being an operational and existential rather than sets and ideal is superior to mathematics. There is no commons possible to construct that is superior to upward redistribution of reproduction, and no harm that can be done to a polity other than it’s reversal.

Lastly: We were wrong about south africa. The same is happening in southern brazil. And unless these are corrected the narrative will continue to accelerate.

Ancestors Worthy of Worship.

We worship our ancestors because we have ancestors worthy of worship.

Alexander began as a real person.
Aristotle began as a real person.
Charlemagne began as a real person.
Sigurd began as a real person.
Arthur began as a real person.
Washington began as a real person.

We have hundreds more like them.

AFAIK, There is no consensus on Odin other than he was indigenous to the western indo europeans, but it is increasingly likely that a real person (prophet, teacher, leader) was somehow integrated with the sky father (thor) and eventually succeeded him. So there is some clash or integration of the split between the east vedics, and the integration of at least the two traditions of the sky father and the leader. The romans could not understand except by analogy and have tainted the record it seems.

Revolution: EU Infrastructure vs USA

Europe is only different in that the population density of Netherlands (505) UK (271), DEU (236), FRA(122), is just far higher than the USA (35), meaning that it is almost impossible to concentrate forces on the american population, and relatively easy for revolutionaries to concentrate attacks on american infrastructure.(edited)

The change (and panic) that will be brought about by even limited civil disobedience in the USA will rock the world economy, and invite world ‘instability’ (meaning opportunism).

The primary vulnerability of the US infrastructure is power.

The Course of A Revolution

(important piece)

The legislature and the courts have determined:

(a) that the social, economic, and political capital costs, are inferior to the social, economic, and political gains of, enforcing:

(b) that the right of free speech, and in particular, political speech, supersedes anyone’s approval or disapproval of that speech, and the costs and consequences of permitting such speech;

(c) and we must not exclude others from association, transit, proximity, employment, residency, goods, services, and information those whom we would otherwise choose to;

(d) whether or not we prefer to ostracize, suppress, or not subsidize their presence, behavior, costs, or consequences; as familial, social, economic, political, normative, traditional, religious, informational, demographic, and genetic competitors;

(e) when and if those others are members of a protected class granted special privileges where those privileges prohibit, suppression ostracization, and non-subsidy;

(f) of that which is inherited rather than chosen (race, sex, creed or class);

(g) but these privileges do not extend to not protection from exclusion by political affiliation;

(h) despite that political affiliation is empirically an expression of race, sex, creed and class; for the purpose of familial, social, economic, political, religious, and demographic competition;

(h) despite the fact that when the market for association and disassociation is suppressed, that the only solution to accumulated conflict is political action; and if the market for political action fails to resolve the conflict; that the only remaining market is that of insurrection, revolution, and civil war;

(i) and despite the fact that there exist only two directions that a polity may evolve:

– Left: large poor caste and class countries, that create low trust, extensive differences, and demand for authoritarian resolution of those differences – or continuous decline of trust and economic velocity otherwise; (South American, Middle East, India)

– Right: Majority empires that require authoritarian governments as a means of defending the core population from borderlands (or forcibly assimilating them); (Russia, China)

– Libertarian: or small homogeneous countries that create high trust, limited differences, and such differences limited to priority, and as a consequence, demand for deliberative resolution of differences. (anglo-scandinavian countries, and pre-unification German countries (princedoms), and most remaining Slavic countries.

(j) and despite that the production of truth telling regardless of consequence, high trust in personal and contractual relations, and the production of voluntary commons, resulting in a market for the voluntary production of commons we call participatory suffrage are the most rare and costly commons a people can create; and that they can only be created by a middle class as mediator between political and labor; and that only in homogeneous polities does this behavior emerge; and that the returns on commons whether private or public are higher than all individual returns possible; and that as such larger organizations and the returns on larger organizations are possible;

(j) and despite that at this point in mans scientific, technological, and economic development; and despite the evidence that the greater the equality of opportunity made possible by greater economic productivity, the greater we demonstrate demand for divergence of our gender, class, race, creed, interests; And as such demand for different commons in support of our demands;

(k) and despite that it is possible to devolve all functions of the federal government other than insurer of last resort – military, juridical conflict between states or collections of states, in matters of tort, the financing of emergency and disaster relief – to the states; and the function of the treasury as a clearing house for currency differences;

(l) and despite that the state, bureaucracy, finance, media, academy complex (the pseudo-scientific, pseudo-rational, together function as a replacement for the church, pulpit, and theological and priestly classes that managed europe’s dark ages) protect their rent seeking and warfare on the middle classes and in particular the world’s only high-trust working and middle classes: ethnic western Europeans.

The purpose of this series of legislative and court rulings, the purpose of which has been forced association and political integration was to:

(a) prevent the separation of the (royalist) south and newly opened western agrarian territory from the northeast (protestant utopian separatist) industrial territory allied with the center dutch financial trading (Rust Belt, Atlantic Port Belt) ; and the resulting loss of control over the continental expansion; loss of political balance between north and south in the federal government, and loss of income that would result in the northeast if the south and west exported goods for use in production elsewhere – such as Europe, given that the majority of tax revenues were produced by the import export trade – thus rendering the south wealthier in political economic and military power than the north.

(b) forcing the introduction of undesirable ex-slaves, and immigrants into competitors with the social, economic, political, demographic and religious orders, in order to obtain and maintain the desired political power to preserve the north’s income from the western expansion;

(c) despite the movement to, and success at returning ex-slaves to Africa, and paying owners for the freedom of those slaves; and instead paying the alternative cost of the war in lives, wealth, suffering, and civilization.

(d) first by the Utopian Protestants of the Northeast, Second by the Financial and Industrial influence of the Northeast, third by the attempt of women’s suffrage movement to grant slaves liberty as an initial proxy for women’s suffrage; and fourth by the sequence of communists socialists Marxists and postmodernists, combining the interests of the Jewish Socialist and Utopian Protestant movements.

Culminating in:

(a) First the destruction of the black communities and their emerging middle and political class, by introduction of the soviet relocation process that produced the urban slums that destroyed the great American cities; the purpose of which was to use the vulnerability of majoritarian democracy to demographically and politically undermine the American strategy of producing a ‘third way’ of middle class meritocracy as a counter to church equality and state authority, and underclass burden.

(b) the intentional undermining of the American experiment in the third way, by the relaxation of immigration standards and the immigration of world lower and underclasses lacking a history of middle class commercial traditions, habits, and morals; the dedication to telling the truth regardless of cost to self, dominance, competence, or political hierarchy; the absolute nuclear family; voluntary responsibility for property and commons; and the requirement for self sufficiency before marriage and reproduction.

(c) the destruction of the rule of law of reciprocity we call ‘tort’, the voluntary civil society, the destruction of the family, the destruction of the narrative of western ascent in the arts, sciences, engineering, law, economics, and politics, despite western disadvantages in population and distance from the origin of cities and the center of continental trade, and lack of flood river valleys for irrigation, concentration of capital concentration, and the resulting utility of taxation.

(d) the transformation of a central government the purpose of which was defense, treasury, trade, and insurer of last resort between a federation of corporations we call states, to a continental imperial government over those states; to a hemispheric empire to exclude Europeans (competitors); to a usurper of the British empire of banking, finance, trade, and war; to an international empire to preserve the postwar peace – producing an international empire that is funded by the continuous genetic, economic destruction of the middle classes, including their standard of living, way of life, and civilization.

(d) the destruction of our western educational system, a replacement of Western Heroic education and our story of the past 3500 years using truth, duty, reciprocity, and rule of law, and political humility of ‘risen man’ against the elements, with Semitic Victim education of ‘oppressed or fallen man’ in communism,socialism,democratic socialism; equality not just of opportunity, but of outcome; the myth of oppression of the underclasses, rather than incremental domestication of man as we had domesticated plants and animals; by the continuous culling of the predatory and parasitic, and upward redistribution of reproduction; a tradition that made western (and eastern) civilization possible in the ancient and modern worlds; And with the thousand year Semitic Dark Age our only period of stunted growth – just as Judaism accomplished nothing except mysticism and parasitism upon host peoples during those periods, and Islam accomplished nothing other than the conquest and destruction of the great civilizations of the ancient world; and the continuous genetic, cultural, and intellectual decline Islam caused, once the accumulated physical, genetic, and cultural assets of the great civilizations were exhausted;

(e) the creation and propagation of pseudosciences of Boasian anthropology, Freudian Psychology of non-conformity rather than continuous expression of necessary instinctual demand for acquisition of that which advances one’s interests; Marxist history and economics, and the possibility of both communism and socialist government without the utility of market pricing and consequent incentives; and the postmodern replacement of the supernatural with the post-rational: that there is no truth, no reason, no science, only political force; and the intentional installation of these pseudosciences in our universities, secondary, and primary educational systems, and the funding of these pseudosciences by the state; and the demand for these pseudosciences by a population lacking ability and will to pursue science, technology, engineering, economics, and law;

(f) the elimination of poetic memorization; grammar, logic, argument, and rhetoric; the failure to add rule of law (the failure to add economic history; and the failure to add accounting, banking, and basic economics to the curriculum for the sole purpose of obscuring the function of our world, thus preserving the falsehoods of the pseudosciences of Boas, Freud, Marx, Cantor, Frankfurt; and the pseudo-rationalistsms of the French Postmodernists.

(f) the continuous replacement of the tenets of supernatural religion under which we must obey a theologians interpreting the commands of a despotic false god, with the lie of equality rather than dramatic inequality and the lie of the desirability of equality rather than meritocracy and charity (1) demographics create demand for norm, culture, tradition, economy, political order and law; (2) that genders are equal in moral and cognitive biases, ability, and interests when they are opposites due to our evolution’s evolved roles in reproduction, (2) the lie that intelligence, industriousness, and appearance are not the cause of our differences in outcome, and are the reason for the differences that we call ‘classes’; (3) the lie it is not in our interest to separate and produce commons suitable to the demands of the demographic, (4) the lie that the optimum political order is not small and homogeneous, with the only value of political scale being i) warfare, and ii) debt capacity before crash, iii) coercion in trade negotiations, iiii) scale of the network of political rents that can be extracted from the people against their will. (5) the lie that the Pareto rule is escapable in that 50% of all value is performed by the top 10%, and 50% of all value of that 10% is produced by its ten percent, and so on; so that we are not only unequal but vastly unequal in value to one another; And that the defection of the top percentiles causes devastation to the remainder -everywhere and in every era it has occurred. (6) the lie that scale and ‘diversity’ will result in anything other than the current and universal measurable decline in competitive ability and therefore standard of living and especially the quality and frequency of commons.

(g) the ending of libel, slander, and the right of duel (for men to fight for impositions on reputation); and the licensing of ‘scolds’; the expansion of freedom of speech such that people are subject to harassment, and interference, and prosecution in the court of public opinion instead of by a jury of peers; the industrialization of the female competitive strategy using disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, rallying, and reputation destruction by the media, as a replacement for analysis of and negotiation upon voluntary reciprocity and costs. Such that the freedom of speech that was possible under libel, slander, duel, and costly production of propaganda, has been unbound, and the population is saturated no longer by a priesthood of supernaturalism, but a “Commentariat” (media) that actively frames public opinion using the female method and appeal to sentiments (ignorance), and export of risk, rather than informing public opinion with the male method of facts, and full accounting of costs, and accounting of risks, such that we are accountable for our choices, and people are continuously trained for civil society.

(h) The cumulative destruction of the bonds of the society by attempted at providing reward through consumption rather than production of familial and civil commons. The removal of their choice by the expansion of taxation such that the gains of the entry of women into the work force have been captured as redistributions to political, financial, and underclass rent seekers; made worse by the failure to reform the monetary system that since the advent of fiat money consists only of digital record of shares in the economy used as a money substitute, and directly distributable to citizens (consumers) as dividends for wise political and economic choices, thus empowering the financial system to extract vast rents from the people without contribution to or risk in the production of goods services and information. There is no reason other than predation upon the people for distribution of liquidity, distribution of stimulus, through the financial system instead of directly to citizens and consumers for use in reduction of debt, stimulation of demand, or stimulation of growth.

(i) The destruction of the institution of marriage; and the economic returns of two parent households; destruction of the necessity of male and female training of children; the necessity of reciprocal and inter-generational care in old age; the production of mental illness, loneliness, and old age suicide on depression-era scales. The expansion of old age poverty rather than it’s decrease. The consequential industrial use of anti-depressants at the top of the scale, marijuana, opioids, and alcohol to medicate the population.

(j) the decline of reproduction sufficient for replacement population necessary to preserve the multitude of rents by members of the state and the underclass, resulting in the genetic destruction of the middle class by demographic conflict between the political and dependent class against the working, clerical, managerial, professional, and entrepreneurial classes: the high trust, self sustaining classes, that make the rents and redistributions of the state possible.

(k) the genocide against these middle classes by one-to-one replacement with third world immigrants due to the policy of redistribution of reproduction from the middle to the underclasses, and redistribution of income from the middle to the political, bureaucratic, and financial classes.

(l) the concentration in wealth among federal rent seekers (DC), Financial Rent Seekers (NY), and Media Rent Seekers (LA), and now Technological Rent Seekers (SF/SEA); and the export of capital, technological advantage, educational advantage; and skilled labor advantage have deprived each state of producing – as did the German princedoms, and European states, and the states before federal monopoly – local hierarchies of excellence and competition in arts, sciences, engineering, technology, economics, and politics.

(m) As such the opportunity created for peoples of the states and regions shall be vast upon retention of funds, capacity of borrowing, and competition for norms, commons, production and talent. The reallocation of capital from media, financial sector, and the academic sector such that each must serve local rather than imperial demands shall create economic and cultural opportunity not seen since the discovery and conquest of the continents.

Therefore Having:

(a) Having accumulated such demographic, social; economic, political distortions and asymmetries;
(b) Having accumulated so many rents by top and bottom against the middle that the state, bureaucratic, financial, media, academy, complex has neither the incentive, means, or ability to change;
(c) Having licensed and institutionalize gossip, reputation destruction, pseudoscience, falsehood, and false promises;
(c) Having conducted a genocide against the middle, and the ethnically European in particular.
(d) Having reached the demographic conditions under which we must act now or lose the accumulated civilizational achievements of our ancestors, and our present efforts at preserving the western order of civilization; and our desire that future generations benefit from the restoration of Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, and Markets for association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, and polities that we call ‘liberty’;

(a) it is necessary to demand separation such that peoples with different distributions and different abilities and different demands, can produce those private and common they desire by the means appropriate to their abilities, intuitions, and preferences.

(b) separation can be performed by:
i) intentionally and slowly by continuation of the ‘big sort’ that is currently underway;
ii) intentionally and quickly by organized devolution to the states.
iii) Intentional secession by groups of politically, demographically, and economically allied states along well established ‘sub national’ lines (“The American Nations”)
iv) The closure of federal agencies, and the reallocation of those services and talent to the states.

(c) and if not organized separation then the bloodiest civil war in history that will make all other civil wars pale; and the winner’s imposition of dominance upon the remainder.

d) Such a war will include:
i) the continuous loss of benefit distribution, communication, power, water, sanitation, and transport of goods to urban centers; And the inability of responders to safely repair them.
ii) the decimation of local first responders and their retreat into barracks;
iii) The explosion of race, class, political, and religious violence; and specific targeting of races on one side, and media-state-academy on the other.
iv) The use of the national guard (which has small numbers)
v) the involvement of third party nations
vi) the collapse of the financial system, trade, the dollar, the pricing system, and consequent shortage of cash.
vii) the seizure of third parties contained by the American military and political system of the opportunity for political territorial, financial, and military reorganization and expansion.
viii) the seizure of American assets abroad by existing hostile parties;
ix) and the defacto collapse of the federal government due to the combination of domestic and foreign self interest.

Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
3 Comments5 Shares

Definition of Commentariat

—“The Commentariat is fighting for its Life to protect it’s ability to frame public opinion, and profit from it.”—

com·men·tar·i·at [ˌkämənˈterēət]

members of the news media considered as a class.
“the commentariat exuded recriminations when the air attacks were called off”

the media · the newspapers · the papers · the news media · journalism · the newspaper world · the newspaper business · the print media · the fourth estate · journalists · newspapermen · newsmen · newspaper women · reporters · columnists · commentariat · pressmen · presswomen · journos · hacks · hackettes · newshounds · newsies · publicists · Fleet Street

An Oath

—“I swear to my fathers and brothers, and to my mothers and sisters. back to the beginning, that I shall transcend myself and mankind, into the gods we seek, by demand for the virtues of heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and warranty from all others; and I shall grant the same to any who consent; and shall protect the interest of those who came before us, those of us living, and those of us yet to come, by force of rule, prosecution, restitution, and punishment of those who resist.”—

Hitler and The Socialist Dream

(We knew this but the mainstream didn’t.)

He declared that ‘national socialism was based on Marx’ Socialists have always disowned him. But a new book insists that he was, at heart, a left-winger
—“It is now clear beyond all reasonable doubt that Hitler and his associates believed they were socialists, and that others, including democratic socialists, thought so too. The title of National Socialism was not hypocritical. The evidence before 1945 was more private than public, which is perhaps significant in itself. In public Hitler was always anti-Marxist, and in an age in which the Soviet Union was the only socialist state on earth, and with anti-Bolshevism a large part of his popular appeal, he may have been understandably reluctant to speak openly of his sources. His megalomania, in any case, would have prevented him from calling himself anyone’s disciple. That led to an odd and paradoxical alliance between modern historians and the mind of a dead dictator. Many recent analysts have fastidiously refused to study the mind of Hitler; and they accept, as unquestioningly as many Nazis did in the 1930s, the slogan “Crusade against Marxism” as a summary of his views. An age in which fascism has become a term of abuse is unlikely to analyse it profoundly.

“His private conversations, however, though they do not overturn his reputation as an anti-Communist, qualify it heavily. Hermann Rauschning, for example, a Danzig Nazi who knew Hitler before and after his accession to power in 1933, tells how in private Hitler acknowledged his profound debt to the Marxian tradition. “I have learned a great deal from Marxism” he once remarked, “as I do not hesitate to admit”. He was proud of a knowledge of Marxist texts acquired in his student days before the First World War and later in a Bavarian prison, in 1924, after the failure of the Munich putsch. The trouble with Weimar Republic politicians, he told Otto Wagener at much the same time, was that “they had never even read Marx”, implying that no one who had failed to read so important an author could even begin to understand the modern world; in consequence, he went on, they imagined that the October revolution in 1917 had been “a private Russian affair”, whereas in fact it had changed the whole course of human history! His differences with the communists, he explained, were less ideological than tactical. German communists he had known before he took power, he told Rauschning, thought politics meant talking and writing. They were mere pamphleteers, whereas “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun”, adding revealingly that “the whole of National Socialism” was based on Marx.

“That is a devastating remark and it is blunter than anything in his speeches or in Mein Kampf.; though even in the autobiography he observes that his own doctrine was fundamentally distinguished from the Marxist by reason that it recognised the significance of race – implying, perhaps, that it might otherwise easily look like a derivative. Without race, he went on, National Socialism “would really do nothing more than compete with Marxism on its own ground”. Marxism was internationalist. The proletariat, as the famous slogan goes, has no fatherland. Hitler had a fatherland, and it was everything to him.

“Yet privately, and perhaps even publicly, he conceded that National Socialism was based on Marx. On reflection, it makes consistent sense. The basis of a dogma is not the dogma, much as the foundation of a building is not the building, and in numerous ways National Socialism was based on Marxism. It was a theory of history and not, like liberalism or social democracy, a mere agenda of legislative proposals. And it was a theory of human, not just of German, history, a heady vision that claimed to understand the whole past and future of mankind. Hitler’s discovery was that socialism could be national as well as international. There could be a national socialism. That is how he reportedly talked to his fellow Nazi Otto Wagener in the early 1930s. The socialism of the future would lie in “the community of the volk”, not in internationalism, he claimed, and his task was to “convert the German volk to socialism without simply killing off the old individualists”, meaning the entrepreneurial and managerial classes left from the age of liberalism. They should be used, not destroyed. The state could control, after all, without owning, guided by a single party, the economy could be planned and directed without dispossessing the propertied classes.

“That realisation was crucial. To dispossess, after all, as the Russian civil war had recently shown, could only mean Germans fighting Germans, and Hitler believed there was a quicker and more efficient route. There could be socialism without civil war.”—


The Inconceivability of Our Differences

It is inconceivable to a conservative or libertarian how much time a liberal spends thinking about equality – the same as a female spends thinking about her status – a fear of being left behind. It is equally inconceivable to a liberal, how little conservatives or libertarians think about equality – only the actions they can take to maintain their position or improve its condition. The right has no fear of being left behind.

Freshness of Sensation: Math, Philosophy, Poetry

These disciplines provide opportunity for creative mines to continuously produce the sense of novelty at zero economic cost. The important idea here is ‘zero cost’. Math, Poetry, and Philosophy, and even perhaps the three act narrative, prevent the pseudoscientific, pseudo-rational, and pseudoscientific, if they are taught as measurement (math), experience (poetry) law (philosophy), and play (literature).

For those of us in ‘need’ of continuous novelty (and who would die of tedium and regularity), these disciplines provide endless opportunity for novelty. novelty prevents the depression of the jaded: nihilism.

As a child I would plan what I would think of when I would go to bed, because I needed a problem to think about or visualize to go to sleep. In college I suffered for studying art which required travel and supplies rather than philosophy which required nothing more than access to a library. As an adult I needed the same every day – software provides that – and when software became obvious and repetitious – economics and philosophy filled the gap. At this stage of my intellectual development I understand that narrative poetry in particular, (not the postmodern nonsense that is a substitute for it) is essential to the training of the mind as is math and law. And the fact that we do not teach literature as the science of continuous change of archetypes, such that the puzzle pieces of narrative are as logical as any other discipline – a lost opportunity for all.

We must understand that those lacking these abilities must in the end resort to entertainment provided by others, by consumption, or by self medication. And they much choose between nihilism and loneliness, or optimizing and socialization. And the answer is pretty clear which group is happiest.

Race Differences in Mental Health

—“Asian students showed a greater risk of suicidal behavior, yet lower rates of mental health diagnoses compared to white students. Black students reported lower rates across all outcomes versus white students.”—

This data is consistent and every finding merely reinforces established patterns.

There appears to be some truth to the tie between white creativity and white mental instability.

Blacks are most emotionally stable, and more prosocial if less agreeable.

A Prayer – An Oath

—“I swear to my fathers and brothers, and to my mothers and sisters, and all their line, back to the beginning, that I shall transcend myself and mankind, into the gods we seek, by demand for the virtues of heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and warranty from all others; and I shall grant the same to any who consent; and shall protect the interest of those who came before us, those of us living, and those of us yet to come, by force of rule, prosecution, restitution, and punishment of those who resist.”—

Nietzsche, Rand, Evola Properly Positioned

by Emanuel Venator
(solid gold)

Nietzsche, Rand, Evola, etc. are useful because they show that it is possible for rightists to tell an alternate story about the world and, in doing so, give permission to think differently.

However, they are limited in that they speak in the language of stories rather than falsifiability and therefore cannot be said to deal in truth, strictly defined. In that way, they are like artists and are useful for the same things, propaganda and personal reflection.

Still, insightful as they may be, they are not useful as evidence for the goodness of restoration or as justification for taking coercive measures to achieve it.

For that only truth will do. The sooner we discipline our minds for truth telling the sooner we will get there.

South Africa, Some Data. and It Isn’t Pretty

by Lloyd De Jongh

(Note from Curt: I am all for africa for africans, asia for asians, europe for europeans, but I am not too keen on killing each other)

June 1990 to July 1993 saw a total of 8580 (92%) of the 9,325 violent deaths during the period June 1990 to July 1993 caused by Africans killing Africans, or as the news media often calls it, “Black on Black” violence – hostel killings, ANC killings of Inkatha Freedom Party members (a policy of the ANC), and taxi and turf war violence.

HRC figures show 21 000 deaths between 1948 and 1994 – only 7 000 of which occurred during the 41 years of Apartheid proper – 1948-1989. Once the ANC was unbanned violence exploded, leading to 14 000 deaths between 1989 and 1994.

The white SA government was accused of killing their political offenders:

In 1979-1980 there were no deaths in SA prisons. In the previous 10 years 37 died versus 274 in the same period in Wales and England.

The activities of the Civil Cooperation Bureau as outlined by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, were also included in these figures.

The security forces of the RSA caused 518 deaths (5.6%) throughout this period.

During the transitional period, the primary causes of death were not security forces nor white right-wing violence against blacks, but mainly due to “black-on-black necklace murders”, tribal conflict between the ANC-IFP, bombs by the ANC and PAC’s military wings in shopping centers, landmines on farm roads, etc.

Violent deaths from 1994 to 2000:

The SA Police reports for the month August 2001 show a total of 174,220 people died violent deaths, from crime-related violence or related to hate-crime against whites, and especially against the Boers, between 1994 and the year 2000. So 29 000 murders per year after the ANC took power for the next 6 years. It was a little safer under the previous government.

• In 1972, SA blacks owned 360,000 vehicles. (More than all the black African states combined).

• The monthly income of blacks per capita in 1988 was R352 per month in South Africa – Malawi and Mozambique was less than R20 per month.

• In 1974, the average monthly income of black workers in South Africa were $ 127 versus the $ 140 in the US, the richest country in the world.

• In 1970, black workers earned R1,751 million, or 25.5% of the total wage fees in SA and increased to R17,238 million in 1984 (1,000% growth) and 32.3% of total wages in SA.

• Between 1962 and 1972 the UN paid $ 298 million to underdeveloped countries compared to South Africa that spent $ 558 million on the development of its black areas.

• The budget amount for black education increased every year from 1970 to almost 30% more than any other government department.

• From 1955 to 1984 the number of black scholars increased from 35,000 to 1,096,000. In 1988 71% of the adult black population could read and write versus 47% in Kenya, 38% in Egypt and 34% in Nigeria. On average during the year 15 new classrooms per working day were built for black scholars.

• In 1985 there were 42,000 black students enrolled at SA universities.

• There were 5 black universities and 28 higher education institutions funded by the government.

• Soweto with its population of 1.2 million had 5 modern stadiums versus Pretoria with its 600,000 whites who had three. Soweto had 365 schools versus Pretoria 229. In Soweto in 1978, there were 115 football fields, three rugby fields, 4 athletic tracks, 11 cricket fields, two golf courses, 47 tennis courts, 7 swimming pools, 5 bowling halls, 81 basketball fields, 39 children playgrounds and countless community halls, cinemas and clubhouses.

• In Soweto in 1978, there were 300 churches, 365 schools, 2 technicons, 8 clinics, 63 kindergartens, 11 post offices and its own fruit and vegetable market.

On the matter of number of deaths pre- and post-Apartheid, we know there were 7000 deaths during those 41 years up to 1989. There were 14000 deaths between 1989 and 1993. In 1994, once Nelson Mandela took office, he opened up the prisons and let out 1000s of hardened criminals. Murder numbers for that year were ~25000, many times the numbers prior to the ANC government. So in 41 years the white government recorded 7000 deaths, but under the ANC there were 40000 between 1989 and 1994, just a 5 year period. Murder rates have remained at or near those levels since then.

Ok, so let’s take the nice black tribes that murdered 2 Million of each other (roughly half the population of the land) before the evil white people put a stop to the genicide. And then they separated them and said if you aren’t in each other’s faces maybe you won’t slaughter each other. Separation – the literal meaning of Apartheid. I know you have a preconceived idea about Apartheid, and obviously know much more than me about the situation, a poorly educated black South African. The Middle Class was integrating well, until the ANC put a definite stop to that. Change takes time, unless you like living next door to murderous, warlike tribes that are in the Stone Age and might go to war at any second with the tribe on the other side of you because “other tribe bad”.

It’s a telling and consistent pattern that there is a subtle effort (overt too) to minimise, obscure or deflect from atrocities committed by blacks, especially when they surpass anything done by Europeans or European settlers. There would be endless recrimination of white people committed these sorts of crimes, but there is little engagement and discussion of black atrocity, incompetence, failure and corruption.

Aborigines literally did crush the heads of newborns each year, but academics want to talk about their efforts in “Agriculture” (TED, you know you’re guilty). It is because of the lack of ability to provide food that the babies were killed, so these efforts at crop growing were patently crap.

But we have to pretend that these efforts were superb and white academics have overlooked this remarkable achievement through misguided racism. When it comes to slavery it gets even worse, the bias is overwhelming. The Nguni in southern Africa made up some of the most primitive, warlike, barbaric tribes in the world – they were not paragons of virtue then or now. They were no strangers to committing genocide or the rights of conquest in their lust for “land”.

The Science On Racial Differences: We Are Very Different.

Science on racial differences


          Some people in society have been under the false impression that the only differences between the human races is that of skin colour – a belief which is patently untrue. The races, or sub-species, of mankind have evolved over many thousands of years, and – as with sub-species of non-human species – they evolved in different ways, causing many differences: some physical, some mental, some readily apparent, and some not so obvious. Many Multiculturalists even deny that races themselves exist, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.[1]
Scientists across the world have been discovering more and more differences between the races, and for the political orthodoxy of Multiculturalism to deny these differences is as ridiculous as the medieval religious orthodoxy denying that the Earth revolves around the Sun.

Continue reading

Crime: Science Answers the Question: Geography, Economy, Neoteny and Class Size.

Black males are (extremely) disproportionately responsible for crime, which corresponds to black disproportionality of the lower IQ curve, and the black disproportionality of the faster rate of maturity curve, and black disproportionality of the testosterone curve, and black dominance of the reverse-neoteny curve.

Blacks have shorter gestation periods. Blacks have lower metabolisms useful in heat, but lower industriousness as a consequence, when this factor alone will produce as great a difference in income potential as intelligence. Stereotypes are not only a necessity of temporal and cognitive efficiency, but they are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences because they must survive daily falsification (survival from competition). Because blacks mature earlier, and are more socially dependent for judgement and experience teen status pressure earlier and more deeply, they are disproportionately affected by awareness of lower social, sexual, economic, and political market value – when in proximity to other groups (Diversity is a ‘bad’). Despite the fact that (affect of deeper maturity) have higher self confidence at conflict with signal feedback. Worse, black males are disproportionately from single mother homes. And single mothers produce the majority of children with problems, particularly with children that mature early.

So it is somewhat ‘torturous’ to mix black, muslim, and Hispanic with white, asian, and jewish populations, which creates conflict when what each group needs is homogeneity so that they can develop norms, laws, and institutions that suit their rates and depths of maturity and their vastly different class distributions. The worst crime whites have done was not slavery, which was endemic, it was to copy the soviets and force integration and deprive blacks of their emerging norms and institutions, but also their emerging middle, professional, and upper classes, who ‘defected’ due to the cost of carrying the vast black underclass and laboring class, that cannot compete outside of it’s own demographic.

Africans evolved to survive heat, disease gradient, parasite gradient, many predators, many many human competitors. They have superior physical traits from bones, to sprinting to hearing, to skin. This is because neoteny is dangerous in their ancestral environment wich rewards rapid and deep maturity, and they were not able due to distance from trade routes, able to institute an agrarian empire sufficiently concentrated per square mile to cause upward reproduction of the upper classes due to continuous starvation of the underclasses.

The lower latitudes produce greater ability to expand the upper classes (higher neoteny), and the higher latitudes produce greater abiity to sustain the lower classes (Less neoteny).

Ethnocentrism is always superior for the simple reason that we can produce norms and institutions that suit our group’s distributions without competing for norms and institutions with others that require different norms and institutions.

We use the examples of ashkenazim and sub saharan african as extremes at both ends of the spectrum. But the spectrum of success at shrinking the population below the minimum necessary for self training (105) is available to every group. The question is whether the elites in any group can force this reproductive change. Because by and large that seems very difficult with the development of rifles, that produced military equality offset only by numbers, and prohibited a professional military caste from domesticating the population through agrarian production.

Right vs Left Fascism

The Purpose of Right Fascism is to punish opposition to truth, reciprocity, duty, family, nation, and continuously evolutionary and eugenic civilization.

The Purpose of Left Fascism is to punish truth, reciprocity, duty, family and nation to produce continuously devolutionary and dysgenic civilization.

There is every reason in the world for the left to suppression Truth, Reason, Reciprocity, and Science. Dysgenia is in their reproductive interests.

It’s Time To Break Up Facebook

Professor Who Coined Term ‘Net Neutrality’ Thinks It’s Time To Break Up Facebook (

Best known for coining the phrase “net neutrality” and his book The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires, Wu has a new book coming out in November called The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. In it, he argues compellingly for a return to aggressive antitrust enforcement in the style of Teddy Roosevelt, saying that Google, Facebook, Amazon, and other huge tech companies are a threat to democracy as they get bigger and bigger. “We live in America, which has a strong and proud tradition of breaking up companies that are too big for inefficient reasons,” Wu told me on this week’s Vergecast. “We need to reverse this idea that it’s not an American tradition. We’ve broken up dozens of companies.”

“I think if you took a hard look at the acquisition of WhatsApp and Instagram, the argument that the effects of those acquisitions have been anticompetitive would be easy to prove for a number of reasons,” says Wu.

And breaking up the company wouldn’t be hard, he says. “What would be the harm? You’ll have three competitors. It’s not ‘Oh my god, if you get rid of WhatsApp and Instagram, well then the whole world’s going to fall apart.’ It would be like ‘Okay, now you have some companies actually trying to offer you an alternative to Facebook.'”

Breaking up Facebook (and other huge tech companies like Google and Amazon) could be simple under the current law, suggests Wu.

But it could also lead to a major rethinking of how antitrust law should work in a world where the giant platform companies give their products away for free, and the ability for the government to restrict corporate power seems to be diminishing by the day.

And it demands that we all think seriously about the conditions that create innovation. “I think everyone’s steering way away from the monopolies, and I think it’s hurting innovation in the tech sector,” says Wu.

American Nations: Demographic Comparisons

The population of California is roughly the same as Canada, and roughly the same as the black population of the USA, 37m .

The Hispanic population of the USA is 55m, and greater than any state in America. The population of Spain is 60m. The population of mexico is 127M.

Fully half of white Americans live in cities, towns and villages smaller than 45,200 people.

A full 17% of the entire American population lives in the 20 largest cities but less than 11% of white Americans do.

Rural areas ex: Newton IA (0-15,000) 26.4%
ex Newton-Wallingford CT (15,000—45,000) 18.9%
ex Wallingford-Des Moines (45,000—370,000) 20.9%
ex Des Moines-Indianapolis (370,000-1.2 million) 11.8%
Suburbs of cities 11.6%

The top twenty cities 10.5%


Our “Roskomnadzor”: American Censorship Is Merely Privately Funded

—“The West also has its Roskomnadzor (Ros’-ko-mnad’-zor / Роскомнадзор), but it’s private.”— Maxim V Filimonov

Roskomnadzor: The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media or Roskomnadzor is the Russian federal executive body responsible for censorship in media and telecommunications

Founded: May 12, 2008
Number of employees: 3,019 (2017)
Headquarters: Moscow, Russia
Parent agency: Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation
—“If you want to know the correct opinion on anything relating to the internet – censorship, privacy, net neutrality, bluecheck privilege – it’s the opposite of what the NIGARFAGTs want: Netflix, Instagram, Gofundme, Amazon, Reddit, Facebook, Apple, Google, and Twitter.”—Michael Andrade

(Via Steve Pender)