—“Revolt, Separate, Specialize, Prosper, Speciate, and Transcend Animal Man.”—

1. The Source of the Success of The European People and their Civilization

No civilization understood its group evolutionary strategy. But we have come to understand ours:

When the first Aryans combined horse, bronze and wheel, they were able to cover long distances with speed. They took risks, and horse, chariot (cart), and armor were very expensive –  but they were able to prey upon neighboring people, as well as defend their own. So they used this military technology to expanded from western China to Spain.

The result is that if a people are militarily capable of it, and develop a professional warrior caste, that capturing better territory and enslaving primitive locals for labor, was a profitable industry.  But only some subset of the population is fit for being ruled cost effectively and at low risk.  So where consanguineous tribes had tolerated wide variations in personalities, the rulers did not, found the most aggressive the most troublesome, and by constant prosecution of outliers, the rulers achieved with man, what they had achieved with dog, sheep, pig, cow, and horse: gradual domestication of the animal man.

Slavery is expensive – you are responsible for all costs, serfdom less – taking only the proceeds and some of their labor, employee less – taking most of the proceeds and paying them, and credit slave even less – using dilutive fiat credit to grant them consumption and capturing most of the real proceeds of their production.

So over the centuries our ancestors have used the combination of hanging half to one percent of the population per year, delaying reproduction and limiting reproduction with manorialism, the harsh winters to starve the feeble and lazy, frequent wars under the promise of booty, and the conspiracy of the church to enfeeble the underclasses so that by the late middle ages Europe consisted largely of the progeny of the middle genetic classes.

Christianity provided little more than an excuse to justify Aryanism: the industry by which the martial class domesticated man for profit.  This was followed by the White Man’s Burden – a restatement of Aryanism in Moral terms. Which was followed by the American Project – a restatement of Aryanism in heroic terms.  Which was followed by Postwar Democratic Secular Humanism – a restatement of christianity in secular terms. And which we have seen most recently as Neo-Conservatism: a restatement of Judaism in Aryan terms.

Now let us flip that around, and say that because we have domesticated man, maintained tripartism, practiced unconflated rule for each class, and created markets in every aspect of life, rule of law under the natural common law, and an ever more correspondent definition of truth, we have dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, labor, disease, and the constant fear of the vicissitudes of nature. We have made this world more so than any other civilization.

Not because we were first, but because we were FASTEST to learn and adapt – despite being a small population on the edge of the bronze age.

The problem facing mankind, we didn’t finish the job: We wrongly constrained Germany’s attempt to complete the formation of the north sea’s Hanseatic civilization, and created a civil war that nearly destroyed us; and in doing so allowed the second ideological invasion of the West in the form of pseudoscience, sophism, and outright denial, and are now bringing aboard millions of those people who we have struggled for 1400 years to prevent from spreading the cancer of their ideology – a more venomous version of the first professionalization of lying.

So, will we go quietly into the night, or will we continue to domesticate mankind, or will we return to the domestication of man, profiting from the domestication of man, and continuing the transcendence of many, through the most expensive commons that any civilization has ever developed: truth.

2. Our Just Cause

The legislature and the courts have determined:

(a) that the social, economic, and political capital costs, are inferior to the social, economic, and political gains of, enforcing:

(b) that the right of free speech, and in particular, political speech, supersedes anyone’s approval or disapproval of that speech, and the costs and consequences of permitting such speech;

(c) and we must not exclude others from association, transit, proximity, employment, residency, goods, services, and information those whom we would otherwise choose to;

(d) whether or not we prefer to ostracize, suppress, or not subsidize their presence, behavior, costs, or consequences; as familial, social, economic, political, normative, traditional, religious, informational, demographic, and genetic competitors;

(e) when and if those others are members of a protected class granted special privileges where those privileges prohibit, suppression ostracization, and non-subsidy;

(f) of that which is inherited rather than chosen (race, sex, creed or class);

(g) but these privileges do not extend to not protection from exclusion by political affiliation;

(h) despite that political affiliation is empirically an expression of race, sex, creed and class; for the purpose of familial, social, economic, political, religious, and demographic competition;

(h) despite the fact that when the market for association and disassociation is suppressed, that the only solution to accumulated conflict is political action; and if the market for political action fails to resolve the conflict; that the only remaining market is that of insurrection, revolution, and civil war;

(i) and despite the fact that there exists only one spectrum in which a polity may evolve:

– Left: large poor caste and class countries, that create low trust, extensive differences, and demand for authoritarian resolution of those differences – or continuous decline of trust and economic velocity otherwise; (South American, Middle East, India)

– Right: Majority empires that require authoritarian governments as a means of defending the core population from borderlands (or forcibly assimilating them); (Russia, China)

– Libertarian: or small homogeneous countries that create high trust, limited differences, and such differences limited to priority, and as a consequence, demand for deliberative resolution of differences. (anglo-scandinavian countries, and pre-unification German countries (princedoms), and most remaining Slavic countries.

(j) and despite that the production of truth telling regardless of consequence, high trust in personal and contractual relations, and the production of voluntary commons, resulting in a market for the voluntary production of commons we call participatory suffrage are the most rare and costly commons a people can create; and that they can only be created by a middle class as mediator between political and labor; and that only in homogeneous polities does this behavior emerge; and that the returns on commons whether private or public are higher than all individual returns possible; and that as such larger organizations and the returns on larger organizations are possible;

(j) and despite that at this point in mans scientific, technological, and economic development; and despite the evidence that the greater the equality of opportunity made possible by greater economic productivity, the greater we demonstrate demand for divergence of our gender, class, race, creed, interests; And as such demand for different commons in support of our demands;

(k) and despite that it is possible to devolve all functions of the federal government other than insurer of last resort – military, juridical conflict between states or collections of states, in matters of tort, the financing of emergency and disaster relief – to the states; and the function of the treasury as a clearing house for currency differences;

(l) and despite that the state, bureaucracy, finance, media, academy complex (the pseudo-scientific, pseudo-rational, together function as a replacement for the church, pulpit, and theological and priestly classes that managed europe’s dark ages) protect their rent seeking and warfare on the middle classes and in particular the world’s only high-trust working and middle classes: ethnic western Europeans.

The purpose of this series of legislative and court rulings, the purpose of which has been forced association and political integration was to:

(a) prevent the separation of the (royalist) south and newly opened western agrarian territory from the northeast (protestant utopian separatist) industrial territory allied with the center dutch financial trading (Rust Belt, Atlantic Port Belt) ; and the resulting loss of control over the continental expansion; loss of political balance between north and south in the federal government, and loss of income that would result in the northeast if the south and west exported goods for use in production elsewhere – such as Europe, given that the majority of tax revenues were produced by the import export trade – thus rendering the south wealthier in political economic and military power than the north.

(b) forcing the introduction of undesirable ex-slaves, and immigrants into competitors with the social, economic, political, demographic and religious orders, in order to obtain and maintain the desired political power to preserve the north’s income from the western expansion;

(c) despite the movement to, and success at returning ex-slaves to Africa, and paying owners for the freedom of those slaves; and instead paying the alternative cost of the war in lives, wealth, suffering, and civilization.

(d) first by the Utopian Protestants of the Northeast, Second by the Financial and Industrial influence of the Northeast, third by the attempt of women’s suffrage movement to grant slaves liberty as an initial proxy for women’s suffrage; and fourth by the sequence of communists socialists Marxists and postmodernists, combining the interests of the Jewish Socialist and Utopian Protestant movements.

Culminating in:

(a) First the destruction of the black communities and their emerging middle and political class, by introduction of the soviet relocation process that produced the urban slums that destroyed the great American cities; the purpose of which was to use the vulnerability of majoritarian democracy to demographically and politically undermine the American strategy of producing a ‘third way’ of middle class meritocracy as a counter to church equality and state authority, and underclass burden.

(b) the intentional undermining of the American experiment in the third way, by the relaxation of immigration standards and the immigration of world lower and underclasses lacking a history of middle class commercial traditions, habits, and morals; the dedication to telling the truth regardless of cost to self, dominance, competence, or political hierarchy; the absolute nuclear family; voluntary responsibility for property and commons; and the requirement for self sufficiency before marriage and reproduction.

(c) the destruction of the rule of law of reciprocity we call ‘tort’, the voluntary civil society, the destruction of the family, the destruction of the narrative of western ascent in the arts, sciences, engineering, law, economics, and politics, despite western disadvantages in population and distance from the origin of cities and the center of continental trade, and lack of flood river valleys for irrigation, concentration of capital concentration, and the resulting utility of taxation.

(d) the transformation of a central government the purpose of which was defense, treasury, trade, and insurer of last resort between a federation of corporations we call states, to a continental imperial government over those states; to a hemispheric empire to exclude Europeans (competitors); to a usurper of the British empire of banking, finance, trade, and war; to an international empire to preserve the postwar peace – producing an international empire that is funded by the continuous genetic, economic destruction of the middle classes, including their standard of living, way of life, and civilization.

(d) the destruction of our western educational system, a replacement of Western Heroic education and our story of the past 3500 years using truth, duty, reciprocity, and rule of law, and political humility of ‘risen man’ against the elements, with Semitic Victim education of ‘oppressed or fallen man’ in communism,socialism,democratic socialism; equality not just of opportunity, but of outcome; the myth of oppression of the underclasses, rather than incremental domestication of man as we had domesticated plants and animals; by the continuous culling of the predatory and parasitic, and upward redistribution of reproduction; a tradition that made western (and eastern) civilization possible in the ancient and modern worlds; And with the thousand year Semitic Dark Age our only period of stunted growth – just as Judaism accomplished nothing except mysticism and parasitism upon host peoples during those periods, and Islam accomplished nothing other than the conquest and destruction of the great civilizations of the ancient world; and the continuous genetic, cultural, and intellectual decline Islam caused, once the accumulated physical, genetic, and cultural assets of the great civilizations were exhausted;

(e) the creation and propagation of pseudosciences of Boasian anthropology, Freudian Psychology of non-conformity rather than continuous expression of necessary instinctual demand for acquisition of that which advances one’s interests; Marxist history and economics, and the possibility of both communism and socialist government without the utility of market pricing and consequent incentives; and the postmodern replacement of the supernatural with the post-rational: that there is no truth, no reason, no science, only political force; and the intentional installation of these pseudosciences in our universities, secondary, and primary educational systems, and the funding of these pseudosciences by the state; and the demand for these pseudosciences by a population lacking ability and will to pursue science, technology, engineering, economics, and law;

(f) the elimination of poetic memorization; grammar, logic, argument, and rhetoric; the failure to add rule of law (the failure to add economic history; and the failure to add accounting, banking, and basic economics to the curriculum for the sole purpose of obscuring the function of our world, thus preserving the falsehoods of the pseudosciences of Boas, Freud, Marx, Cantor, Frankfurt; and the pseudo-rationalistsms of the French Postmodernists.

(f) the continuous replacement of the tenets of supernatural religion under which we must obey a theologians interpreting the commands of a despotic false god, with the lie of equality rather than dramatic inequality and the lie of the desirability of equality rather than meritocracy and charity (1) demographics create demand for norm, culture, tradition, economy, political order and law; (2) that genders are equal in moral and cognitive biases, ability, and interests when they are opposites due to our evolution’s evolved roles in reproduction, (2) the lie that intelligence, industriousness, and appearance are not the cause of our differences in outcome, and are the reason for the differences that we call ‘classes’; (3) the lie it is not in our interest to separate and produce commons suitable to the demands of the demographic, (4) the lie that the optimum political order is not small and homogeneous, with the only value of political scale being i) warfare, and ii) debt capacity before crash, iii) coercion in trade negotiations, iiii) scale of the network of political rents that can be extracted from the people against their will. (5) the lie that the Pareto rule is escapable in that 50% of all value is performed by the top 10%, and 50% of all value of that 10% is produced by its ten percent, and so on; so that we are not only unequal but vastly unequal in value to one another; And that the defection of the top percentiles causes devastation to the remainder -everywhere and in every era it has occurred. (6) the lie that scale and ‘diversity’ will result in anything other than the current and universal measurable decline in competitive ability and therefore standard of living and especially the quality and frequency of commons.

(g) the ending of libel, slander, and the right of duel (for men to fight for impositions on reputation); and the licensing of ‘scolds’; the expansion of freedom of speech such that people are subject to harassment, and interference, and prosecution in the court of public opinion instead of by a jury of peers; the industrialization of the female competitive strategy using disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, rallying, and reputation destruction by the media, as a replacement for analysis of and negotiation upon voluntary reciprocity and costs. Such that the freedom of speech that was possible under libel, slander, duel, and costly production of propaganda, has been unbound, and the population is saturated no longer by a priesthood of supernaturalism, but a “Commentariat” (media) that actively frames public opinion using the female method and appeal to sentiments (ignorance), and export of risk, rather than informing public opinion with the male method of facts, and full accounting of costs, and accounting of risks, such that we are accountable for our choices, and people are continuously trained for civil society.

(h) The cumulative destruction of the bonds of the society by attempted at providing reward through consumption rather than production of familial and civil commons. The removal of their choice by the expansion of taxation such that the gains of the entry of women into the work force have been captured as redistributions to political, financial, and underclass rent seekers; made worse by the failure to reform the monetary system that since the advent of fiat money consists only of digital record of shares in the economy used as a money substitute, and directly distributable to citizens (consumers) as dividends for wise political and economic choices, thus empowering the financial system to extract vast rents from the people without contribution to or risk in the production of goods services and information. There is no reason other than predation upon the people for distribution of liquidity, distribution of stimulus, through the financial system instead of directly to citizens and consumers for use in reduction of debt, stimulation of demand, or stimulation of growth.

(i) The destruction of the institution of marriage; and the economic returns of two parent households; destruction of the necessity of male and female training of children; the necessity of reciprocal and inter-generational care in old age; the production of mental illness, loneliness, and old age suicide on depression-era scales. The expansion of old age poverty rather than it’s decrease. The consequential industrial use of anti-depressants at the top of the scale, marijuana, opioids, and alcohol to medicate the population.

(j) the decline of reproduction sufficient for replacement population necessary to preserve the multitude of rents by members of the state and the underclass, resulting in the genetic destruction of the middle class by demographic conflict between the political and dependent class against the working, clerical, managerial, professional, and entrepreneurial classes: the high trust, self sustaining classes, that make the rents and redistributions of the state possible.

(k) the genocide against these middle classes by one-to-one replacement with third world immigrants due to the policy of redistribution of reproduction from the middle to the underclasses, and redistribution of income from the middle to the political, bureaucratic, and financial classes.

(l) the concentration in wealth among federal rent seekers (DC), Financial Rent Seekers (NY), and Media Rent Seekers (LA), and now Technological Rent Seekers (SF/SEA); and the export of capital, technological advantage, educational advantage; and skilled labor advantage have deprived each state of producing – as did the German princedoms, and European states, and the states before federal monopoly – local hierarchies of excellence and competition in arts, sciences, engineering, technology, economics, and politics.

(m) As such the opportunity created for peoples of the states and regions shall be vast upon retention of funds, capacity of borrowing, and competition for norms, commons, production and talent. The reallocation of capital from media, financial sector, and the academic sector such that each must serve local rather than imperial demands shall create economic and cultural opportunity not seen since the discovery and conquest of the continents.

Therefore Having:

(a) Having accumulated such demographic, social; economic, political distortions and asymmetries;
(b) Having accumulated so many rents by top and bottom against the middle that the state, bureaucratic, financial, media, academy, complex has neither the incentive, means, or ability to change;
(c) Having licensed and institutionalize gossip, reputation destruction, pseudoscience, falsehood, and false promises;
(c) Having conducted a genocide against the middle, and the ethnically European in particular.
(d) Having reached the demographic conditions under which we must act now or lose the accumulated civilizational achievements of our ancestors, and our present efforts at preserving the western order of civilization; and our desire that future generations benefit from the restoration of Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, and Markets for association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, and polities that we call ‘liberty’;


(a) it is necessary to demand separation such that peoples with different distributions and different abilities and different demands, can produce those private and common they desire by the means appropriate to their abilities, intuitions, and preferences.

(b) separation can be performed by:
i) intentionally and slowly by continuation of the ‘big sort’ that is currently underway;
ii) intentionally and quickly by organized devolution to the states.
iii) Intentional secession by groups of politically, demographically, and economically allied states along well established ‘sub national’ lines (“The American Nations”)
andi) The closure of federal agencies, and the reallocation of those services and talent to the states.
(c) and if not organized separation then the bloodiest civil war in history that will make all other civil wars pale; and the winner’s imposition of dominance upon the remainder.

(d) Such a war will include:
i) the continuous loss of benefit distribution, communication, power, water, sanitation, and transport of goods and energy to urban centers; And the inability of responders to safely repair them.
ii) the exhaustion and decimation of local first responders and their retreat into barracks;
iii) The rapid expansion of panic hoarding, robbing, raiding, destruction, and fire; the explosion of race, class, political, and religious violence; and specific targeting of races  and classes on one side, and media-state-academy on the other.
iv) The use of the national guard to attempt to restore order;
v) the involvement of third party nations both internally and externally;
vi) the collapse of the financial system, trade, the dollar, the pricing system, and consequent shortage of cash.
vii) the seizure of third parties contained by the American military and political system of the opportunity for political territorial, financial, and military reorganization and expansion.
viii) the seizure of American assets abroad by existing hostile parties;
ix) and the defacto collapse of the federal government due to the combination of domestic and foreign self interest.

Given that:

(a) The infrastructure is extremely fragile, the faith in government,  trust in media, and the inter-polity hostility hasn’t been as intense since the civil war (war of northern aggression);
(b) Only three urban police forces are sufficient to retain order for any period of time.
(c) The total numbers of the guard and military are small given the vast area of the country and its thousands of points of infrastructure weakness;
(d) The available male population to participate is more than sufficient.
(e) The degree to which both sides are armed, and the degree of inventory that can be captured and used so large, that the conflict will last long enough that a large portion of the men will prefer to preserve the conflict rather than end it.And most importantly:
(a) the demands we are making – the destruction of the rent system – are beneficial to the aims of both sides other than the newly immigrated underclasses.
(b) The military, treasury, retirement/health, are preserved;
(b) the only reason to resist them is to dominate and conquer the opposition rather than separate and cooperate by trade, ameliorating our differences at the macro level, while serving our differences at the regional and local level.

Every other possibility ends in random chance.  And the cost of that random chance will be millions of lives and trillions of dollars.

Which in the long span of time, is small price to pay for ending genocide, culture-cide, and civilization-cide.

3. How Do We Create a Revolution?

Starting a revolution as an expression of frustration doesn’t necessarily bring change for the better. And some revolutions are far worse than their original states: France and Russia in particular.

To implement change one has to have something to demand. And what one demands has to satisfy a lot of people‘s interests. Those demands have to be possible to put into operational processes that we call ‘institutions‘. They have to be possible to persist regardless of the beliefs of the participants. To persist they have to create the right incentives.

  1. So to create a revolution you need moral authority – something that people will willingly use violence to bring about. And as a moral imperative, and moral justification,  TRUTH IS ENOUGH. We are tired of lies, pseudoscience, and obscurant rational justifications. We are tired of our elites burning our civilization.The truth is enough. Unlike gossip, guilting and shaming. And unlike pseudo-science and propaganda, the truth is expensive.  Truth is the most powerful argumentative weapon ever developed. And Propertarianism teaches us how to demand truth and speak the truth.
  2. After moral authority – then you need a political solution – a set of demands, and in sufficient detail that it is possible to discuss rationally, and implement as formal institutions.
  3. Then you need a sufficient plan of transition that a revolution isn‘t necessary, and people don‘t die by the millions to do it.
  4. Then you need a method of altering the status quo – not a plan – for nullification, secession, revolution, and civil war – and hope you can accomplish it with incremental nullification and secession … but willing to conduct a revolution or civil war if need be. And you pursue all of them at once.
  5. Then you need an ‘organization‘ – a group of people who act as the general staff that answer questions, and propose ideas on how to implement, how to transition and how to raise the cost of the status quo so that the transition is preferable to the uncertainty and instability.
  6. Then you need a small number of people willing to die for their people, culture, and civilization, but who have reasonable belief that their sacrifice is not in vain.

I don’t go into tactics because that‘s unwise. But in general, I try to get across this idea: How many hours of electricity, days of water, days of food, days of ‘order‘ are in the production line every day? I mean, if bad stuff happens in Ukraine and Russia, 40% of food is produced by the people. Everyone can go back to the village to relatives and the farm. What happens in the developed world if it‘s disrupted?

We live in the most fragile time in history. It no longer takes masses in the streets to bring about revolution. It takes a small number of people to increase the friction of daily life. It has never been easier to create a revolution. People just need a plan, moral authority, and something to demand. 

It‘s our job to give it to them:

A Moral License. A Set of Demands. A Plan of Transition. A Means of altering the status quo. 


The Conflict of Our Time

( … reciprocity and hierarchy of the pack vs equality of the herd …)

( … The Great Fight Renewed (semitic vs european … )

(… And no man or men may make a choice to favor cult or corporation over kin without act of genocide, culture-cide, civilization-cide for which the only recourse and restitution is retaliation by and of the same. … )

Our goals are:

  • The incremental evolution of our laws such that we suppress and reverse the institutionalization of the arts of lying that produced the abrahamic dark ages  in the ancient world, and the horrors of communism, socialism, feminism, and postmodernism and their cults in the modern.
  • The equalization of suppression of soft and hard powers of coercion.
  • The extensions of involuntary warranty from goods and services to information and speech.
  • The cessation, reversal, and restitution for  the cumulative rent seeking in all aspects of life;
  • The cessation of organization by the maximization of consumption at the expense of individual, family, nation, the joy of civic life, and the accumulated inheritances from the inventions, labors, and arts of our our ancestors, and restoration of the construction of civic society’s emphasis on commons rather than consumption.
  • The redistribution of coercion, influence, commerce, rights of free association and dissociation, and rights of self determination by the devolution of the federal government into an insurer of last resort, and the restoration of the sovereignty of and alliance of the states;
  • The cessation of the exploitation of the people for purposes of creating and preserving an empire and the state bureaucracy that is counter to the interests of the people.
  • The cessation, reversal, and restitution for the attempt to genocide against our people, our nation, our race; our culture; our government, and our civilization;
  • The restoration of our right to self determination;
  • The restoration of our ancestral rights of sovereignty, and our civilizational strategy of competition and evolution by means of truth, duty, reciprocity, rule of law, markets of voluntary cooperation in all walks of life, and our ability to produce high trust civic commons.


To achieve these goals we submit these demands to a candid world.

The Declaration.